New T206 Error - kidding

[Pat R]

I picked up this Sullivan print flaw, first I want to say I don't consider flaws
like this variations I think of them as multi example print flaws. I will pay
a small premium for these because I find them interesting and I think
they are helpful in the research side of the set.

One of the areas I feel they can be helpful in is trying to establish how many verticals of each subject might have been on a sheet. Most research on these
type of flaws put them in the 8%-10% range which is in line with the 9 or possibly higher same subject verticals that the plate scratch sheets indicate.

[pbspelly]

No offense, but unless it's an inverted Jenny, I find most printing mistakes uninteresting, and never really understand why they are touted as more valuable cards. Seems kind of contradictory to me, when other cards are often severely downgraded for being slightly off-center, weak colors, or having some barely noticeable flaw. Sometimes I almost feel that collectors are looking to create a new thing to collect and value, and latch on to printing errors just for that reason. But I recognize that a lot of people don't share my view.

[mybuddyinc]

Cool, got'ta name it, I suggest:

"Silllivan" error