|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Won my entire group at about 78.6%* of my max bids... Relatively happy...
I had something go 42.3%* of my maximum due to poor a description. Edit* My numbers were wrong when I initially made this statement. They are now correct. Last edited by Sean1125; 01-22-2016 at 08:34 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Even if I had 1 billion dollars I would not spend that on a 70 Jackson even if it were a psa 11. Who the f is paying these prices. I mean at that rate an entire 1970 set would cost you over 1 million in psa 10 assuming some of the stars reach relative prices to the Jackson. That is beyond nuts. Really its incomprehensible.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know if I agree with that Peter, while it technically is a commodity by definition all cards are commodities as they are products. I say its incomprehensible because to me the maximum value of the item is significantly less than 30k no matter how you chose to view it as a card, a commodity or an irreplaceable one of a kind item. Again thats just me.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 01-23-2016 at 07:52 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's also worth noting in this discussion that not all 9s and 10s are indeed the same. Sometimes it is actually easier to parse a 9 from a 10 that a 2 from a 3, if for example the 9 has one tiny flaw that lets you know off the bat it will never 10. Of course, that said, there are many 10-worthy cards hiding in 9 holders. All depends on the unique, individual cards in question. Though guys who find high end 9s and believe in them often will be persistent until they get that 10 on review, so such 9s are becoming scarce. In fact all "high-end" cards, which by that term let us say means a card that looks under graded, are likely becoming scarce at all grades as they are hunted down for sport and reviewed. Regarding the assertion about Registry Sets, the majority but I hope not all can be characterized that way. It certainly does seem from browsing around there that 99.99% of the sets contain what I would call either over-graded cards or cards with low eye appeal for such high grades-- indicating that, Leon, you are spot on. The interesting thing is that high grade and high eye appeal are not mutually exclusive qualities in a card, and so a beautiful registry set with cards that are all worthy of their high technical grades is very possible, surely some must exist. I am trying to build one such Registry Set, and all I care about is the card, and that it is the exact card I love and am looking to feature for that issue. Last edited by MattyC; 01-23-2016 at 09:43 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sean, No need to be so shy.....
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I went back and did the math so I am factually correct.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mile High Wins | iwantitiwinit | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-17-2015 09:24 PM |
| Altered high grade E93s in Mile High? | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 294 | 07-11-2015 02:59 PM |
| Mile High Lot 802 | oldjudge | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-15-2013 12:09 AM |
| Mile High Auctions | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-27-2010 11:37 PM |
| Mile High- T 209 Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-02-2008 02:13 PM |