|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Hank, I certainly didn't mean that as a personal attack on you. Simply put, the truth can stand on it's own - it doesn't need confirmation.
I understand why you did it, he's your buddy. The timing of your post just looked suspicious as it was a prepared statement. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Kevin -
Thanks for coming forward with a logical explanation for your inclusion on "the list". Any other COC Paragraph 2 "offenders", please feel free to jump in now that Kevin has paved the way...perhaps Kevin's situation is unique, but there are still many on the list that have remained silent. Kudos to Kevin and his lawyer for good detective work. I hope you are able to get something in writing from the U.S. Attorney's Office to make your defense iron-clad.
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 114/119 (95.8%) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 180/180 (100%) |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You might have more fun by judging each one of them individually in their own thread.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I, for one am happy he posted because I would have been left hanging wondering what this additional information he indicated would be coming out of this mess really was. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Hi David,
Thank you for your candor and for allowing me the opportunity to address your concern—I have not spoken with Hank today but I see that he has posted a response to you already…and just to be clear, I never asked Hank to write a statement on my behalf. In fact, I have refrained from asking anyone (unless you included my lawyer) to intervene on my behalf – either here on Net 54 or anywhere else -- including Hank. I have had dozens of people contact me over the past many days to offer themselves as character witnesses, but as I have stated before, I want the facts to speak for themselves. I realize the truth of what happened to me may not be enough to satisfy everyone but I remain confident that fair-minded people who take the time to read through the story and its convolutions will conclude that I did nothing wrong—Kevin K. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Bill,
Thank you for your suggestion. It may interest you to know that my lawyer also released my statement yesterday to Michael O’Keefe of the New York Daily News and I believe he has already published it there (online, I think). I understand that O’Keefe is also reporting that Exhibit E has now been "redacted", but not sure what that means, at this point.... --Kevin K. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Kevin,
Thanks for clearing this up regarding your appearance on the list. Makes perfect sense to me. I also think it adds to the integrity of your authentication service, that you would want to bid in a competitive auction for something you say is genuine. It's guaranteeing your service : "I stand by my authentication, in fact, I'll buy it myself at a price higher than what others will pay." There are OTHER scenarios where an authenticator could pull off something shady, like under grading an item to buy it cheap, over grading an item to re-sell it, and so on, but what you did is tell the world these items were genuine and then you backed it up with real money, attempting to acquire them yourself. Not only is this not doing anything wrong, I think it should accrue to your credit. I also think you handled the situation well in waiting for your lawyer to get things straightened out before posting here. That was just plain smart. When that list first came out and the predictable lynch mob started forming, my first thought was this: If for some reason I was on the list (I wasn't and would not have been) the first thing I'd do is talk to an attorney, tell him everything I could recall about my dealings with that AH, and then decide if he was the right attorney for me. I'd choose my attorney based on his initial advice. Guess which of these two bits of advice I'd consider to be best: 1. "Let me look into this and I'll let you know what I find out and we can go from there. For now, keep your mouth shut." 2. "I'll look into it. Meanwhile, I recommend you go to every internet blog and chat room you can find, and blab your head off about it." What I'm saying is, I'll bet there are lots of other innocent people on that list who are remaining quiet on advice from an attorney, and I am also saying that would be the smart thing to do. People are being sentenced to multiple years in federal prison... this isn't something to be sloppy about for those inadvertently caught up by it. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Allen sentenced
I believe he was sentenced to 57 months in prison
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
I know who Kevin Keating is, but I have never had any dealings with him, and I'm not sure that I've ever conversed with him
However, I have known Hank Thomas for many, many years and have had many conversations and dealings with him. And it is my belief that NO ONE in this hobby of ours has A HIGHER LEVEL OF INTEGRITY than Hank Thomas. Val Kehl |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
I sent the following email to Kevin Keating on February 9 after a review of Exhibit E and his response to the matter. Exhibit E standing alone does not disclose how the government's investigation confirmed collusion among specific parties to shill bid, it does clearly show the conflicted inter-party transactions that exist between the auction houses and those that do business with them.
There is the need for more transparent and verifiable auction practices and controls to detect and prevent shill bidding along the line I presented in my email to Kevin Keating that follows. It is my opinion, that there is a clear need for the major auction firms to step up and address this issue to ensure the integrity of their business practices. I stand behind my comments to Mr. Keating. Bob Cawly Re: Mastro-Legendary Auction's Shill Bidding Report Response From Robert H. Cawly To qualityautographs qualityautographs@msn.com Kevin Just let me say that after reviewing Exhibit E, it appears to me that you were also a victim of the shill bidding and that your bidding patterns were customary with many dealers and collectors that desire to take an early position on a number of lots to hold a place in extended bidding. In any event, the infraction is one of RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS which make you ineligible to bid. The more appropriate classification would be "Bids by Ineligible Bidders" as opposed to calling them all shill bids. While the effect is the same as placing a shill bid, the implications are completely different. All reputable auction houses should post a list of Related Parties and make known the Related Party Policies which would include auction house employees, and employees of subcontractors, authentication firms and other related companies. The real issues reside with the business practices of the auction firms. It is up to the auction house to enforce its own rules, not the bidders. The prudent auction house would have each auction overseen by an well known and reputable independent accountant that would oversee the bidding process, and audit the auction records. This one step would clearly establish what auction firms are interested in restoring honesty and integrity to our hobby and care about their firm's credibility. The expense of such a process would clearly be affordable and a sound investment. Knowing of your credentials and reputation for integrity from people in the industry and notably fellow UACC members, let me express my full confidence in your response in this matter. Robert H Cawly, CPA UACC RD326 |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Kevin is one of the first big guys in the hobby that treated me fairly and honestly when I was a young man getting started in the hobby. I would go to shows in my early 20's and other big dealers would not even bother to stop and show me a card in their cases, while Kevin was very personable and for that I have always respected him. Getting to know him more over the years and having numerous encounters with him, I always thought he was one of the more respectable people in the hobby. It is not surprising to me at all there is a rational explanation for his name being on the list. I am happy he was able to clear the air.
Rhys Yeakley
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Not to drag up an old thread, but I was just on Kevin's website and I was surprised on his prices. He is charging 2-3x the going rate for most items. Do people actually pay his prices? I know he is one of the best in the hobby, but am not going to pay a premium for living modern day players.
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Then don't pay it. You don't need to tell anyone you are not going to do it. People can charge whatever the hell they want for stuff. When it's your stuff, you can do what you want with it.
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
+1
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
I get it. You guys are dealers and you guys are friends with Kevin. I fully understand that you're defending him and all dealers. However, I was just wondering how a person so highly respected in the hobby can offer prices that are not competitive. That is my only question. I am sorry if I insulted anyone.
Last edited by jimjim; 04-06-2016 at 12:12 PM. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Prices
Maybe he is colluding with Levi and Dean to keep all their prices high so no one will buy anything and bring the hobby to a standstill.
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Deleted
__________________
T206 154/518 second time around R312 49/50 1962 Topps 598/598 super set 694/697 ...whatever I want Last edited by drmondobueno; 04-06-2016 at 12:15 PM. Reason: Redundancy |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For a dealer who has stuff that's "right" or in other words trusted to not be fake, some of the higher costs are related to the cost of replacing the inventory. The few autographs I've ever sold went for the going rate for what they were. Once popular football players who signed at shows, 8x10s with no certs but the show flyers and auto tickets. Originally $25, and it wasn't clear if that included the cost of the photo. Both sold for about the cost of an unsigned photo, which was typical. I was happy with that price. But if I was a full time dealer? I'd have asked probably a bit more than 2-3x the going rate. Because I would have a need to keep those commons in inventory, and I'd have to pay at least the going rate to replace that inventory. How many dealers would do well having none of the cheap stuff? Some, but for most dealers it's the volume of common items that make enough to support the business. And if the reputation becomes "they have good prices, but usually don't have what/anything I want" They won't last long. The same problem comes with being one of those guys who won't pay a decent price for stuff someone is selling. Get a rep as someone who lowballs every time and the really good stuff will never come your way. All of the above is intended to be generic, I don't know Kevin, but I've hung around a lot of dealers and spent a trivial amount of time on their side of the table and that's part of the challenge they've got as I see it. Steve B |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
I am a full time autograph collector and have purchased from Kevin several times. Simply put, the names I have purchased from him are tough (Glasscock, Dahlen) and I don't trust many dealers. I put a premium on paying for his (and other trusted sellers) reputation and background.
That said, every time I have dealt with him, Kevin and his staff could not have been any kinder to me and did not "rush" me through and ignore me. The final thing I want to add is that this a free country and Kevin can charge whatever he wants-just like you can offer any price you want. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Kevin Keating's Negro League Autograph Guide SOLD | AndyG09 | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 1 | 11-17-2013 12:51 PM |
Need help - Kevin Keating Re: eBay | mschwade | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 08-25-2012 07:54 AM |
Kevin Keating? | Mollys Dad | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 29 | 12-31-2010 05:13 PM |
Shill Bidding? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-11-2006 07:25 AM |
shill bidding on this? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-15-2006 12:33 PM |