Grading Older Cards

[Rookiemonster]

I think that certain cards should be graded different . Like 1951 Bowman horizontal pictures .( You know the names ) so I think the bottom boarder should be a bit smaller imo. (Left to right if it was horizontal). Most of the cards I see this way look muck better then perfectly centered .


First and last cards should be given some kind of special quillifiers. Condition sensitive ( CS). Just so you know it seen more of the brunt . Also this could apply to very certain sets .

The other is cards that have rough edges. That is the definition of mint . Factory fresh .

[xplainer]

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster

I think that certain cards should be graded different . Like 1951 Bowman horizontal pictures .( You know the names ) so I think the bottom boarder should be a bit smaller imo. (Left to right if it was horizontal). Most of the cards I see this way look muck better then perfectly centered .


First and last cards should be given some kind of special quillifiers. Condition sensitive ( CS). Just so you know it seen more of the brunt . Also this could apply to very certain sets .

The other is cards that have rough edges. That is the definition of mint . Factory fresh .

See Dustin, that makes perfect sense. CS. Because they are. Especially the vintage cards. The first and last cards did take the most beatings. That should be taken into account.

Makes perfect sense to me.

[irv]

Originally Posted by xplainer

See Dustin, that makes perfect sense. CS. Because they are. Especially the vintage cards. The first and last cards did take the most beatings. That should be taken into account.

Makes perfect sense to me.

I think they already are? Price out a 52 Topps Mathews. It's priced, obviously because it's a high number but also due to what you mention above.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=...ps+mathews+psa