|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The top edge appears trimmed. Still worth $10k, but not what this seller is asking.
The way I see it, the card is really a PSA Authentic in a GAI slab. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly Sean. I personally would still love to own that. Uzit is the coolest back ever! Besides the poor man's (hey that's me!) Polar Bear backs!
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
This card is still in a GAI holder for the same reason any high end card is. It's either over graded or altered and couldn't cross. The first thing any of us would do with a card like that is send it into PSA. I'm sure this occurred to the owner as well.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just to remind everyone, the Copeland collection also had the famous (or is it infamous) Gretzky/McNall PSA 8 Wagner in it too........
Last edited by gnaz01; 03-08-2016 at 04:25 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
By adding the language that it has not been altered or restored in any way, couldn't someone buy it, see what PSA/SGC says, and then get their money back if it was trimmed, even though the return policy is only 14 days? I would assume eBay would make them refund that purchase, correct?
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (18/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (32/50) N184 Kimball Champions (38/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() - Paul
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (18/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (32/50) N184 Kimball Champions (38/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you look at the top border, it slopes slightly upwards if you're looking at it from left to right. The bottom border seems to mirror the top border. It also slopes slightly upwards if you're looking at it from left to right. It looks like a factory cut (although a sloppy one) to me and definitely not uncommon. Here's one that's a lot more pronounced...
Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 03-08-2016 at 04:21 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's in a GAI slab because PSA and/or SGC wouldn't grade it above authentic. Period. It doesn't make any sense for the reason to be anything else. If you owned it and were looking to sell it given the prices for gai v. psa or gai v. sgc wouldn't you have it re-slabbed if it were possible to get a decent numerical grade from PSA or SGC.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Basically you're saying if it weren't trimmed, it would be in a PSA holder, right? Like the PSA 8 Wagner?
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's called a "diamond cut", very common.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1 great card. Love seeing these impossibly tough combos show up in high grade.
__________________
T206 gallery |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
How does PSA handle diamond cuts on a t206 card that would otherwise be a 7 or an 8? Sharp corners, centered, etc.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a too-good-to-be-true cy young portrait (looks ex+ ) thought it was a diamond cut. PSA disagreed and gave it an "authentic". Maybe there's scissor marks I'm missing (not an expert at IDing scissor marks unless very obvious). Wondering if anyone w a diamond cut rejected by PSA (without any obvious scissor marks) should try GAI in order to increase value several fold compared to a N or A from PSA? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by BBB; 03-08-2016 at 11:40 PM. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
This was also discussed, however I'm not overly familiar with diamond cuts and pointed out below PSA gave that Cy Young a trimmed grading.
It just seems illogical that the card wouldn't be crossed over to a PSA slab so those who have their virtual albums and what not could have it in there and well it's more appealing in a PSA or SGC slab. Not sure about the rest of you but I prefer PSA or SGC slabs. I will not buy any card slabbed in any other grading service. I'm sure most if not everyone will agree that if this were in a PSA holder with that grade then that outlandish price wouldn't be so outlandish well maybe it would be but....... The point I'm trying to make is that let's say it is a diamond cut then why doesn't the seller/owner cross it over it just makes sense. Unless I'm mistaken and diamond cuts receive a trimmed designation. Again I'm just finding out about diamond cuts and what the difference is after a couple years of collecting T206s.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I usually don't disagree with Psa , but in this case The edges don't look different than any other t206 I have (other than the diamond cut). It's also without size requirements. So am wondering if PSA defaults to trimmed when they see high grade diamond cuts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: T206 HOFer w/ Uzit or Cycle 460 or any green Cobb | David R | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 07-03-2011 10:33 PM |
| T206 Cobb - UZIT | scottglevy | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 10 | 06-24-2011 10:44 PM |
| Ty Cobb Uzit - STOLEN account!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-09-2004 12:25 AM |
| BMW Heads Up/ Your T206 Cobb Uzit Hijacked | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-20-2004 07:42 PM |
| T206 Cobb w/ UZIT Back ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-11-2002 03:55 PM |