|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not his second-year card, but I bet the 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese card is noticeably more valuable than his RC (1948 Leaf?). - and that's probably just based on the cards' appearances.
. .
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would think his 52T high number is more expensive than the 53B. In any case his RC is 1941 Play Ball (and Double Play).
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
No Pee Wee Reese in the 49 Leafs.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Haha nice Davis run, Bob! That's actually pretty cool to see them back to back. The '66 doesn't look bad at all for being qualified as OC.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
1957 Topps Frank Robinson...I'm cheating as he never got a card for his rookie year in '56. IMO for an outstanding HoFer it's a very undervalued card.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Obviously, after I got my 53 Bowman, I just forgot about the rest...very embarrassing. ![]() . . .
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The T210 jackson is a second year worth a lot more than his e90-1 rookie.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
adding the 62 Williams in an 8 and t210 Jackson back to the original post.
thanks peter and jesse edit: and i think we have a clear case w/ the most recent 71 munson sale @ $30K Last edited by begsu1013; 05-21-2016 at 02:41 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Plus, this pre rookie of Joe Jackson shown below. I might add Cy Young to the list to. He Has an 1891/2 JA Rogers cabinet card in street clothes and his Just So 1893 card would be greater.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
As a set collector these popped into my head...after McClain and Stanley the others may be a bit lame, but certainly fall into the criteria...
I do think the first two though are significant...especially if your looking to buy those two in NM for your sets...1965 Topps Denny McClain RC #236 1966 Topps Denny McClain #540 (66 High Number) 1966 Topps Mickey Stanley RC #198 1967 Topps Mickey Stanley #607 (67 High Number) 1965 Topps Gary Kroll RC #449 1966 Topps Gary Kroll #548 (66 High Number) 1965 Topps George Smith RC #483 1966 Topps George Smith #542 (66 High Number) 1962 Topps Tom Tresh RC #31 1963 Topps Tom Tresh #470 (63 SP) 1962 Topps Don Clendenon RC #86 1963 Topps Don Clendenon #477 (63 SP)
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| most valuable signed cards | theshleps | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-30-2015 06:32 PM |
| Most Valuable Cards in the hobby | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 01-06-2013 05:55 PM |
| 1970's Topps most valuable cards | trobba | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 17 | 12-05-2009 05:02 PM |
| Best year for Rookies? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 02-29-2008 04:57 PM |
| Protect your valuable cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-21-2004 05:38 PM |