|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
He ain't even got no feedback! My BS filter is set to a much more sensitive level thanks to the Net54 crowd. Thanks guys!
__________________
Seeking Type 1 photos especially Ruth I still love the hobby |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
here's a real nice one!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Note how different the background looks. Shadows etc.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
and the "quaity" of the type in the name, team...the fake is different...look closely...not the right color either.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought the dot pattern was wrong and I haven't seen registration look like that when outta whack.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any of you selling yours??
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
right one
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
which is real?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mine
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had one but sold it a few years ago for nothing. I never loved it anyway...it wasn't a particularly nice example. It's one of my favorites and I need another one!
Greg...I like yours a lot!!!!! |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Pete. Hope all is well.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm, hate to be a contrarian, but not all of these cards are fakes. I actually think they look fine to me. His scans wash them out quite a bit and don't appear to show the details on the corners.
Don't know the seller. Obviously zero feedback is never a good sign, but there's no way his sold T206 are fakes. T205s look good. I don't see any problems with the E95s. The E90 Young I'd like to see in person. I don't think these are reprints. Rob |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
[REMOVED] This forum is done.
Last edited by bcornell; 06-21-2016 at 10:31 PM. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Possibly copied from this one?
http://goodwinandco.com/1909-e90-1-a...-lot24234.aspx It appears to have the same misregistration, the same lower border break, and the same red alignment mark at the center top. But there's a small difference on the back. Not that that's a lock, mass production being what it is there should be others that are nearly identical. But combined with the other stuff it's a pretty big red flag. I found it by being lazy just like a reprinter would be, Google look at images, their large scans are probably just about good enough to print well. Steve B |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
That looks like an exact hit to me. Look at the upper right border, in the white on the outside, on the edge. There is a telltale dark mark at the exact same place on both cards. At least that is what it seems to look like. Also, directly across, horizontally, is another telltale spot of white on the black border. Those things pointed out I am still not 100% on this as the areas don't match up perfectly (almost perfectly, but not perfectly, from the scans). I doubt I would take a chance on any of them without a return policy. But with one, buyers should be protected. One other thing that is in favor of it NOT being the same card as in Goodwin is the right border of the current one is thinner than the left border, and on the Goodwin one the right border is thicker than the left one.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-21-2016 at 10:21 AM. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Goodwin has the typical shading.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
I understand there are some very dodgy E90-1 Young - Boston football helmet variation cards that have hit the market. Apparently, they originated somewhere in Texas. Caveat Emptor, Baby
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As for the difference in the shading on various cards, I think some of it has to do with the scan or picture made....They almost all seem to have varying degrees of some shading and I think in person all of them might (I could be wrong). The scan in the holder below is from the auction I bought it from. The other scan is one I just made while typing this post . I have completely neutral settings on my scanner (pre-set I guess). In person the one I just scanned doesn't have as dark of shading as it has in in this scan. It seems darker on the screen than in hand. But my eyes are getting old too!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-21-2016 at 12:42 PM. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
158 successful b/s/t transactions My collection: https://www.instagram.com/collectingbrooklyn/ |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Look at the misregistration at the shoulders, the Ebay card isn't a copy of the Goodwin card. The Ebay card has tilted misregistration that goes into the border on the left side and is further away from the border on the right than the Goodwin card. Pretty close though.
Peter - I don't know why some lack the background shading - I am definitely not an expert on E cards. I just know that one of the first few that I found, which was slabbed by PSA, also lacks it. I can say that I think the cards with the shading look much cooler.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
![]() |
| Tags |
| american caramel, cy young, e90-1 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Real or fake | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-13-2013 03:02 PM |
| Real or fake? | NolanRyan | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 12-14-2012 10:57 AM |
| Real or Fake? | bobbvc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-21-2011 12:40 PM |
| Real or Fake | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-06-2007 03:51 PM |
| another real or fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-28-2005 05:22 PM |