|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's the era of the extreme centering premium. Whether it lasts, who knows.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Comparing these two cards, you can see there is no comparison. It's
not just the centering. The one on the left has weak corners and print on the cap. The bottom corners on the left Mantle is bad. The one on the right has a messed corner on the left but it shows with tremendous eye appeal. Worth a premium? Maybe, but definitely nicer than the other. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not sure which is a 6 in my inexperience, but I'd say the cards should be at least 2 grades apart, not the same.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The sales show collectors are buying the card and not the holder, as I read here many times before. Great job by collectors using their eyeballs.
Because the uglier card is more likely a 5. And the nicer one is really a 7. One is over graded and one under graded, and the market acted accordingly. I would be proud to own the second card. It's really no comparison between the two. Last edited by MetsBaseball1973; 05-12-2016 at 10:16 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
And yet, if both were sent to PSA to regrade, the one on the left would be a four, and the one on the right a five. PSA's laughing all the way to the bank.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
If anyone thinks the centering phenomenon is going away, think again. As I did some searches on the bay last night, in completed auctions, it was easy to tell the nicely centered cards. Even in the same grade there are large pricing deltas. And as a centering nut, I think there should be and am responsible for a bit of the delta myself!! As to the 1953s shown, I would have paid a lot more for the one on the right with the better centering.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-13-2016 at 08:04 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's another example from the last two nights. The 6.5 from PWCC sold for 30% less than the 6 from another eBay auction. Centering is king these days.
![]()
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would say both fall into the PSA 6 spectrum, just a guess, but the one on the right is a "better" 6 .....
Like Peter pointed out, centering is a big deal nowadays regarding price.
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-23-2016 at 01:00 AM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Any more, under PSA or SGC holders, you can't see the wrinkles or minor corner wear nearly as well as you can see the very ugly lack of centering - thus, centering trumps corner wear - and god forbid - small creases I know there are threads elsewhere on this, but I think the centering issue will fundamentally change go-forward grading standards, and will also dramatically drag down prices of off-centered (but not qualified) graded cards in the same way that prices of raw cards have been dragged down the past 15 years since grading became prominent. I'd love a statistical analysis of centered 5s vs. off centered (but not qualified) 6s for high-end star cards. I'm guessing the centered 5s beat the non-centered 6s. I know I just paid way over SMR for 2 centered PSA 6 Mantles...(so maybe this post was my way of trying to justify it to myself!) Last edited by MCoxon; 05-13-2016 at 09:20 AM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is currently a very off centered psa 4 mc 1951 mays ending tonight. I was watching to see is it sells for what a two has been selling for of late. I've seen a psa 2 selling for about 1,100 to 1,400 of late. The 4 is still a nice card color is crisp and it has nice pop to it. Let's see what's what .....
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Topps #89 Stobbs, 1953 bowman color #47 Garver 1953 Archives signed #318 Simmons | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 05-16-2016 04:21 PM |
| Alert: a tale of two 51B Mantles | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 11-22-2015 03:52 PM |
| 1953 Topps Bob Feller PSA DNA & 1953 Bowman Roberts SGC AUTO | brian29575 | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2015 05:47 PM |
| WTB Oddball Mantles (Topps Stamp; Topps Peel Off; Venezuelan; Meadowgold) | Bestdj777 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-27-2014 10:10 PM |
| 1967 topps and 68 topps mickey mantles + three pete rose autos certified | rjackson44 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 04-17-2013 11:18 AM |