![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
| Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54. | WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5). T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back is just as good as the front.
![]() Last edited by thenextlevel; 06-02-2016 at 07:44 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is a nice looking but miscut card. Is it your thought it's under-graded, or just has great eye appeal for the grade?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What's the difference between mis-cut and off-center?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who needs a PSA 6 when I can own this at a FRACTION of the price. (I wish I had more cards to share but I sold them all to buy this!) haha
Not too many nicer 4s... ![]() Last edited by Canofcorn; 06-02-2016 at 12:51 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Never said that it wasn't miscut, just pretty darn good looking compared to what I think of with miscut cards. I would have cracked it if I thought otherwise.
Last edited by thenextlevel; 06-02-2016 at 01:47 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I picked up the Ford because it was selling cheap since it was labeled as OC. I don't see it myself. And I picked up the Williams because it was nicer than the 6's I was seeing.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some first generation PSA cards are graded oc because of the back.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, here's the back. The scan is a bit squashed looking, but you get the idea.
|
![]() |
|
|