![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd say the '64 definitely looks better than the RC, but I also think the '65 looks better than the '64. It never ends!
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about we take the best pose and place it with the dest design to make the ultimate card!
I really like the 79 Rose card, but the design is great too. I might suggest the 79 shot with the 77 design.
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bob, you and I have had this conversation on other boards and I agree. I always prefer the "first solo card" over the RC.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-22-2016 at 10:26 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think the Ryan RC is another example. One of my favorite all time cards is the 1969 Topps Ryan, his first solo card. His RC is downright ugly. On the flip side though, growing up during the "rookie" card chaos of the 80's, cards like the Rose RC are so iconic they transcend beauty to me.
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Though Bench's rookie isnt as ugly as some of the other multi-player rookies, his second year solo card is much nicer.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Up and down the line-up of Topps multi-player rookie cards from the 60s-70s, virtually every one of those player's first solo cards trumps the rookie, MASSIVELY, in the aesthetic sense.
Agree with all of you, nice as the 1964 Pete Rose is, his 1965 is much better. The image, the design, the colors---it all just comes together perfectly!!! ![]() --Brian Powell |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The added problem with the Rose RC, in particular, is that the deign for the Rookie Stars that year was just awful. Just 4 heads floating...
The 64 Rose is awesome. Love the overall look with the All-Star Rookie trophy right next to him as if he is accepting it on the card. Personally, think it's his best looking card, but that's me.. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
63 Rose PSA 7 | Peter_Spaeth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 64 | 09-15-2016 04:20 PM |
FS: Rose RC PSA 6 | ajjohnsonsoxfan | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 3 | 07-13-2016 03:46 PM |
FS 1962 Post Canadian Mays PSA 6 1969 Rose AS 8, 1970 Rose AS 7, 1972 OPC Seaver 6.5 | hcv123 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-12-2014 08:19 PM |
Rose | Taxman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 02-06-2013 03:17 PM |
69 Photostamp Rose PSA 9; 71 Dell Clemente and Rose PSA 9 | Mphilking | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-27-2010 05:42 PM |