|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Pete, Assuming the card is in the condition shown, wouldn't the seller be leaving A LOT of money on the table by not having the card graded? 
				__________________ My new found obsession the t206! | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			the defect is who the seller is.... nothing to see here....if want a Authentic or a 1 then big accordingly | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			of course...the point is there IS something wrong...but I cant figure out what!!!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			if you hold it in hand you will know....easy to have a scan that masks flaws
		 | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			im sure...i've been there with this seller!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			It's just digital counterfeiting. What you're seeing is not real.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			The guy is bad news.  His scan is far too small to be able to see the defect assuming he has not done something in photoshop to hide the flaw(s).
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Not a glaring defect but it does not have Perfect Centering as the listing implies.  It has a rather obvious tilt cut IMO.
		 
				__________________ Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 07-06-2016 at 06:55 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			18 negative reviews - all saying the same thing: the card received was not the card described, with "photoshop" in most complaints.  Add in 3 neutrals and that's 21 unfavorable reviews out of 971 transactions.   
				__________________ My new found obsession the t206! | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Hard to see a defect that's been photo shopped out of the image.   Or the card has been altered.  Either way this is not a gamble worth taking.
		 
				__________________ Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Mcgraw print defect | martin neal | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 08-27-2020 08:01 PM | 
| T206 birth defect | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-24-2014 07:30 PM | 
| Diamond Stars Print defect questions | keating3620 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-08-2014 03:49 PM | 
| 57 t williams ex j bunning rookie psa5 ex 58 cepeda rookie psa4ex 59 aaron mays ex | joepa | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-03-2011 04:07 PM | 
| Weird Old Judge Defect / Bubney 75 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-10-2005 05:07 PM |