PSA 8 T-206 Wagner Reholder

[e107collector]

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

How WOULD they, or how SHOULD they?

How would PSA proceed??

How should they is a whole other story.

Tony

[Rich Klein]

If I were the owner of that card, it would be in the same holder I purchased it in. The Wagner is so famous (there is a book written about it after all) that any changes to the holder would hurt it financially. Therefore, no changes at all makes the most sense

Rich

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

If I were the owner of that card, it would be in the same holder I purchased it in. The Wagner is so famous (there is a book written about it after all) that any changes to the holder would hurt it financially. Therefore, no changes at all makes the most sense

Rich

Right, there would be nothing to gain. The grade would obviously not go up.

But if it was resubmitted, PSA would have no choice but to give it an "A". How could they possibly explain not doing so?

[pokerplyr80]

If he actually mailed it in without talking to anyone first I think someone would give him a call and tell him to keep the card as is. I guess I should have voted other, as I don't think they would reholder it at all.

[nsaddict]

Would love to hear Joe Orlando's answer, although he wasn't aboard when Wags got graded.

[Vintagecatcher]

Since this trimmed T206 was the first card graded by PSA that would make it their first mistake.

I never understood the logic if they could make a mistake on this million dollar card, what's to say they couldn't incorrectly grade any other submission?

Not a fan of graded cards regardless of the slabber.


Patrick

[Bigb13]

If it's trimmed it should be Authentic. It should be no different than any other card.

[Stampsfan]

Originally Posted by Vintagecatcher

Since this trimmed T206 was the first card graded by PSA that would make it their first mistake.

So using a simple proration theory, based on a small sample size of 1, that means (as of this moment), there are 26,699,867 authentication / grading mistakes out there.

[pbspelly]

At this point, it would have to be graded as a Mint version of the Mastro/Gretzky Trimmed-But-Graded-An-8 T-206 Wagner, which is a category unto itself.

[ls7plus]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

If I were the owner of that card, it would be in the same holder I purchased it in. The Wagner is so famous (there is a book written about it after all) that any changes to the holder would hurt it financially. Therefore, no changes at all makes the most sense

Rich

Exactly right. The card is a hobby legend--no one's going to be dumb enough to screw around with it!

Larry

[clydepepper]

Originally Posted by ls7plus

Exactly right. The card is a hobby legend--no one's going to be dumb enough to screw around with it!
Larry

you mean...again...right?

[Jobu]

Does reholder = regrade or does a reholder simply entail cracking and putting in a new slab?

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

If I were the owner of that card, it would be in the same holder I purchased it in. The Wagner is so famous (there is a book written about it after all) that any changes to the holder would hurt it financially. Therefore, no changes at all makes the most sense



Rich

I agree with Rich. After all that's happened, the holder and flip are as much a collectible as the card.