|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I posted when this thread started that I still get it and enjoy some of the articles, particularly by Lemke and Vrechek.
But a couple issues back they ran a rather long article by some guy ( do not remember name) who gave a lengthy opinion about why two bats thought in the hobby to be genuine, the bat used by Ruth to hit the first home run in Yankee stadium and a bat used by DiMaggio during the hitting streak, were likely not genuine. I know nothing about bats other than what I learned at the Louisville Slugger bat museum, and do not collect them. But I found the article interesting In the next issue Bartsch had a very short note saying he had failed to adequately fact check the article and author. Nothing more about what he had discovered wrong with the multi page article/analysis. Pretty disappointing. In his defense I think his resources are slim there these days. Last edited by ALR-bishop; 08-05-2016 at 01:29 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was a long time subscriber for many years through the mid 1990's, but let my subscription stop. I have decided to subscribe again recently, since it was very affordable. Obviously, it is not as good as it had been, but I find it a somewhat (a little) useful nowadays.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Set collectors: which school of thought do you subscribe to? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-24-2013 09:04 PM |
| OT- NY Sports Fans who subscribe to Time Warner and are being screwed | RichardSimon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 22 | 02-17-2012 09:24 PM |