 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-10-2016, 06:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Not "PSA"
..." P G S "----from 1990's to early 2000's .......I think the latest card I ever saw in a PGS holder was 2004..... I'll look deeper into it. There were lots of grading companies at one time....probably some old threads about long-gone graders but I've never quite figured out the " search" on 54..
.. 
|
|
#2
08-10-2016, 06:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Thanks for the info.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922
|
|
#3
08-10-2016, 08:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lots of variations with these cards just like you said, Mike.
Note the different Pirates, pronounced and un-pronounced teeth on the Indians, some dark horsemen as well, and lastly, some different looking Tigers. Still looking for other anomalies/defects/UER's, which, I now think I'll have no trouble finding.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 08-10-2016 at 09:13 PM.
|
|
#4
08-11-2016, 03:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Virtually Every '52 Topps Detroit Player
 ....it's actually tough to find two cards of different players with the same tiger colorations... ...Here's four , then I've got more ... .
|
|
#5
08-11-2016, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
And Four More 1952 Topps Tigers Varieties
 ...if we can get these all recognized by The Catalogue , we could get the "52 Master Set up towards four digits.... ..note the only one eyebrow on Ted Gray's tiger.. ..
|
|
#6
08-11-2016, 04:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Just looked at a few more of mine and noticed my Rojek also sports the red horseman. I also noticed the elephant on the Joe Tipton card is different than than on the Wright card. And hardly any blue on the Giants logo of Williams compared to the Thompson card. My gut tells me I could find a ton more of these but the most consistent cards that I have noticed so far, seem to the Boston Red Sox sock.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922
|
|
#7
08-11-2016, 05:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
08-11-2016, 05:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What I have noticed, which makes them variations to me, is that some of these cards, although the players are different, come from the same series. I could easily understand variations between say a Pafko and a high numbered player, (311 up) from the same team having a variation due to different printing times, but it becomes questionable to me when you see these variations in the same series.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 07:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 05:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 08:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
