NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2016, 08:18 AM
basesareempty basesareempty is offline
B.ob L.amb
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
Amazing. I hope there is more backlash for posting false fraud accusations on this site than there was for posting a joke about a cat.
I agree!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2016, 09:19 AM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,718
Default

Larry,

PSA reviewed the card to determine if it was authentic or not ( a fake ). That is all PSA did. They did not regrade the card. The card was graded years ago so there is no need to regrade the card, and PSA applied a new label ( as evident with the PSA hologram ) and holder. The registration number did not change.

You've been on the board for a number of years and know that grading is subjective. We have all seen cards graded 5's that should be 7's, and 7's that should be 5's.

What ever the case, the card graded what it did at the time.

Mike has a nice PSA 6 Aaron, that MOST of us would love to have.

He appears to have gone above and beyond to relieve any doubt about the cards authenticity.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2016, 09:51 AM
sflayank sflayank is offline
larry s
larry ser.ota
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sunrise fl
Posts: 4,898
Default Aaron

Obviously you are completely unaware of the actual situation...NOBODY claimed the card wasnt real
And it was not sent in for that purpose..if it was sent in at all..which i doubt...PSA GRADING GUARANTEE....read it...since hes selling the card anyway psa would happily give him current market value if they made a grading error....if there is someone on this board who believes that card is exmt....i have many many baseball cards in that condition id like to sell for exmt prices....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2016, 10:08 AM
Neal's Avatar
Neal Neal is offline
Ne@l K.ane
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 1,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflayank View Post
Obviously you are completely unaware of the actual situation...NOBODY claimed the card wasnt real
And it was not sent in for that purpose..if it was sent in at all..which i doubt...PSA GRADING GUARANTEE....read it...since hes selling the card anyway psa would happily give him current market value if they made a grading error....if there is someone on this board who believes that card is exmt....i have many many baseball cards in that condition id like to sell for exmt prices....
Why would you doubt that this card was sent back in to PSA? Even after it resides in the new holder with a brand new flip? Even though Mike was never mentioned in the OP, he has been since and the back story made public, and you are still accusing him of not being upfront and honest - time to apologize.

He did not grade the card. PSA did.

At this point, the grade is not the issue. PSA graded the card, reholdered the card, and it is what it is.
__________________
Neal

Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others

https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2016, 10:04 AM
wilkiebaby11 wilkiebaby11 is offline
$téve VV1lk
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 1,595
Default

You can't passively state "there may be a fake PSA 6 up for sale on the board". That's just shenanigans and in absolute poor character; not becasue you posted it, but becasue you won't stand behind your accusation. Just becasue you didnt directly point it out, does not mean you are not 100% implying that that is the particular card that you are referring to. The only credence is that you only stated that it could be a fake (becasue you have zero proof that it is). In that case, I think that you are justified in trying to solve your doubts and relay them, but you better be able to walk the walk and you are now playing dumb.

You called him out, so now you have to either prove it, or at least say that you can't.

How would you like it if someone said:
"There may or may not be a 52 Mantle SGC 6 floating around the boards that is most likely a fake. The price may or may not have been dropped a half dozen times. If said card and post existed, it's obviously not being sold becasue it is probably a fake.".
I'm sure you would be pissed as just the slightest amount of doubt in the authenticity of a card with turn off any buyer.

In one hand, pointing out possible counterfeits/fakes/scams is important. However, you can't be frivolously doing it (not saying that you were). What does need to happen though, is when you have been proven wrong, you need to make it right and say that you were wrong; not cower behind your keyboard and playing ignorant and dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2016, 10:17 AM
sflayank sflayank is offline
larry s
larry ser.ota
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sunrise fl
Posts: 4,898
Default aaron

im still waiting for the proof
he is refusing to show his receipt for sending in the card for review
instead he shows a probable fake email.....if you send in a card for review they get it just like any submission...look at it and send it back....an apology email?..and they dont reholder for free...that card would be an additional 35 for reholder
if his story is true...then with the reholdered card he received a copy of the invoice and receipt
lets see it
as for the flips...aaron rookies ruths and mantles are the most common cards being switched...people should be on the lookout.....that card is 3 grades off
thats sets off a red flag....doesnt mean the flip is fake....but id be cautious
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:09 AM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflayank View Post
im still waiting for the proof
he is refusing to show his receipt for sending in the card for review
instead he shows a probable fake email.....if you send in a card for review they get it just like any submission...look at it and send it back....an apology email?..and they dont reholder for free...that card would be an additional 35 for reholder
if his story is true...then with the reholdered card he received a copy of the invoice and receipt
lets see it
as for the flips...aaron rookies ruths and mantles are the most common cards being switched...people should be on the lookout.....that card is 3 grades off
thats sets off a red flag....doesnt mean the flip is fake....but id be cautious
Still waiting for proof? Mike doesn't owe you anything. I would have told you to f off a long time ago and mind your own business. He has chosen to take the high road and has shown a lot of class in the way he has handled your ridiculous accusations. Perhaps you could learn something from his example.

The apology email appears to be simply for a delay in responding.

The card has clearly been reholdered. The fee for this service is $7, not 35, for a card with a declared value under 5k. Whether or not you feel the card is over graded is irrelevant. I think your sgc 6 Mantle with major centering and tilt issues is over priced and over graded. But I wouldn't start a thread about it.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2016, 02:32 PM
basesareempty basesareempty is offline
B.ob L.amb
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
still waiting for proof? Mike doesn't owe you anything. I would have told you to f off a long time ago and mind your own business. He has chosen to take the high road and has shown a lot of class in the way he has handled your ridiculous accusations. Perhaps you could learn something from his example.

The apology email appears to be simply for a delay in responding.

The card has clearly been reholdered. The fee for this service is $7, not 35, for a card with a declared value under 5k. Whether or not you feel the card is over graded is irrelevant. I think your sgc 6 mantle with major centering and tilt issues is over priced and over graded. But i wouldn't start a thread about it.
bang!!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by basesareempty; 08-23-2016 at 02:33 PM. Reason: SPELLING
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2016, 02:45 PM
Canofcorn Canofcorn is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 233
Default

+1

Last edited by Canofcorn; 08-23-2016 at 04:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2016, 03:10 PM
sflayank sflayank is offline
larry s
larry ser.ota
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sunrise fl
Posts: 4,898
Default aaron

boy...u must be blind this cards a 4 and its way nicer than your 6
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:11 AM
TheNightmanCometh's Avatar
TheNightmanCometh TheNightmanCometh is offline
Ryan Waggoner
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California, USA
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflayank View Post
im still waiting for the proof
he is refusing to show his receipt for sending in the card for review
instead he shows a probable fake email.....if you send in a card for review they get it just like any submission...look at it and send it back....an apology email?..and they dont reholder for free...that card would be an additional 35 for reholder
if his story is true...then with the reholdered card he received a copy of the invoice and receipt
lets see it
as for the flips...aaron rookies ruths and mantles are the most common cards being switched...people should be on the lookout.....that card is 3 grades off
thats sets off a red flag....doesnt mean the flip is fake....but id be cautious
Why should you need to see a copy of the invoice and receipt when he's posted the before and after flip pics of the card? You'd have to be blind as a bat to not see that they are the exact same card in two different pics; one without the hologram and one with. They are the same card and the hologram proves that he resubmitted the card.

Stop with the witch hunt.

Last edited by TheNightmanCometh; 08-23-2016 at 11:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:15 AM
dio dio is offline
Eric Cheng
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA still
Posts: 275
Default

reholder is the cheap part, the shipping/return shipping+ inusrance probably cost another $50
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:20 AM
Canofcorn Canofcorn is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 233
Default

.....

Last edited by Canofcorn; 08-24-2016 at 07:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:29 AM
MattyC's Avatar
MattyC MattyC is offline
Matt
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canofcorn View Post
This will be my last post in this thread. Since you continue to attack my credibility, saying I refuse to show a receipt and providing a probable fake email, here is a screen shot of my PSA order. Clearly, an expert like you realizes I had 2 day Super Express service for $85, and not just a reholder. They would not label it Super Express for a simple reholder. So, there you go.


Right on, Mike. Life is too short for such unnecessary chafing.

You did the stand up thing the stand up way, and happy to hear the card was solid.

Ignore the noise, and enjoy the day

Best,

MC
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2016, 11:31 AM
111gecko 111gecko is offline
G.ary L.eavitt
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 378
Default Invoice

Boom
Attached Images
File Type: jpg boom.jpg (70.2 KB, 196 views)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-23-2016, 12:44 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 111gecko View Post
Boom
+1

But something tells me that if Larry thought the email was fake, he'll probably think the screen shot is too. I doubt Mike will get an apology.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-23-2016, 10:33 AM
tschock tschock is offline
T@yl0r $ch0ck
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilkiebaby11 View Post
Just becasue you didnt directly point it out, does not mean you are not 100% implying that that is the particular card that you are referring to.
Agreed. Anyone ever see the "... so I'm selling it as a reprint..." qualifiers on ebay. No one had to infer anything because it was already implied.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-23-2016, 10:06 AM
wilkiebaby11 wilkiebaby11 is offline
$téve VV1lk
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 1,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KCRfan1 View Post
Larry,

PSA reviewed the card to determine if it was authentic or not ( a fake ). That is all PSA did. They did not regrade the card. The card was graded years ago so there is no need to regrade the card, and PSA applied a new label ( as evident with the PSA hologram ) and holder. The registration number did not change.

You've been on the board for a number of years and know that grading is subjective. We have all seen cards graded 5's that should be 7's, and 7's that should be 5's.

What ever the case, the card graded what it did at the time.

Mike has a nice PSA 6 Aaron, that MOST of us would love to have.

He appears to have gone above and beyond to relieve any doubt about the cards authenticity.
+1
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do these flips look right to you? the 'stache Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 5 03-27-2013 09:59 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.


ebay GSB