![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree!!!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
PSA reviewed the card to determine if it was authentic or not ( a fake ). That is all PSA did. They did not regrade the card. The card was graded years ago so there is no need to regrade the card, and PSA applied a new label ( as evident with the PSA hologram ) and holder. The registration number did not change. You've been on the board for a number of years and know that grading is subjective. We have all seen cards graded 5's that should be 7's, and 7's that should be 5's. What ever the case, the card graded what it did at the time. Mike has a nice PSA 6 Aaron, that MOST of us would love to have. He appears to have gone above and beyond to relieve any doubt about the cards authenticity.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously you are completely unaware of the actual situation...NOBODY claimed the card wasnt real
And it was not sent in for that purpose..if it was sent in at all..which i doubt...PSA GRADING GUARANTEE....read it...since hes selling the card anyway psa would happily give him current market value if they made a grading error....if there is someone on this board who believes that card is exmt....i have many many baseball cards in that condition id like to sell for exmt prices.... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
He did not grade the card. PSA did. At this point, the grade is not the issue. PSA graded the card, reholdered the card, and it is what it is.
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't passively state "there may be a fake PSA 6 up for sale on the board". That's just shenanigans and in absolute poor character; not becasue you posted it, but becasue you won't stand behind your accusation. Just becasue you didnt directly point it out, does not mean you are not 100% implying that that is the particular card that you are referring to. The only credence is that you only stated that it could be a fake (becasue you have zero proof that it is). In that case, I think that you are justified in trying to solve your doubts and relay them, but you better be able to walk the walk and you are now playing dumb.
You called him out, so now you have to either prove it, or at least say that you can't. How would you like it if someone said: "There may or may not be a 52 Mantle SGC 6 floating around the boards that is most likely a fake. The price may or may not have been dropped a half dozen times. If said card and post existed, it's obviously not being sold becasue it is probably a fake.". I'm sure you would be pissed as just the slightest amount of doubt in the authenticity of a card with turn off any buyer. In one hand, pointing out possible counterfeits/fakes/scams is important. However, you can't be frivolously doing it (not saying that you were). What does need to happen though, is when you have been proven wrong, you need to make it right and say that you were wrong; not cower behind your keyboard and playing ignorant and dumb. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
im still waiting for the proof
he is refusing to show his receipt for sending in the card for review instead he shows a probable fake email.....if you send in a card for review they get it just like any submission...look at it and send it back....an apology email?..and they dont reholder for free...that card would be an additional 35 for reholder if his story is true...then with the reholdered card he received a copy of the invoice and receipt lets see it as for the flips...aaron rookies ruths and mantles are the most common cards being switched...people should be on the lookout.....that card is 3 grades off thats sets off a red flag....doesnt mean the flip is fake....but id be cautious |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The apology email appears to be simply for a delay in responding. The card has clearly been reholdered. The fee for this service is $7, not 35, for a card with a declared value under 5k. Whether or not you feel the card is over graded is irrelevant. I think your sgc 6 Mantle with major centering and tilt issues is over priced and over graded. But I wouldn't start a thread about it.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by basesareempty; 08-23-2016 at 02:33 PM. Reason: SPELLING |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
Last edited by Canofcorn; 08-23-2016 at 04:08 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
boy...u must be blind this cards a 4 and its way nicer than your 6
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Stop with the witch hunt. Last edited by TheNightmanCometh; 08-23-2016 at 11:11 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
reholder is the cheap part, the shipping/return shipping+ inusrance probably cost another $50
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.....
Last edited by Canofcorn; 08-24-2016 at 07:56 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You did the stand up thing the stand up way, and happy to hear the card was solid. Ignore the noise, and enjoy the day ![]() Best, MC |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boom
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
But something tells me that if Larry thought the email was fake, he'll probably think the screen shot is too. I doubt Mike will get an apology. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do these flips look right to you? | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 03-27-2013 09:59 PM |