![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks to me like the card was glued into an album and then removed. The card looks like it has paper loss on the back.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I once graded a 1967 Topps Marichal or McCovey that had missing ink on the back similar to the 1958 Mantle and it graded a PSA 9. Most of the missing ink was in the name, bio and cartoon area. I didn't notice the back it until I was pricing the card after it was graded. If I noticed it beforehand I doubt I would have submitted it.
I told people about the card back when they looked at the card at shows and one of the first people to look at the card was excited it had the defect and bought it. Not everyone looks at cards the same way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 67 Marichal defect is rare but recurring and well know among variations goofballs...like me. It is offered occasionally on ebay. Not so much as a 9
But it is not recognized as a standard hobby variation at this point |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is the back of the 1958 Topps Enos Slaughter, it has the same print defect as the 1958 Topps Mickey Mantle and was probably on the same printing sheet. ETA, the back of the 1967 Topps #500 Juan Marichal with a similar print defect. A PSA 9 of that would be worth mucho dinero to the right collector.
Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 09-04-2016 at 05:12 PM. |
![]() |
|
|