|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is a very gracious 2 handed out by PSA there. Perhaps it didn't get a 1 because it's a Plank.
Any other card that would NEVER get a 2.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It might go for less because of that, but I know if I had the cash I'd put the bid in.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Totally agree there. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/351822309677...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT Last edited by Bored5000; 09-04-2016 at 06:30 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
What was the intention of the OP mentioning this card? Thought it was against rules talking about a card that is in a current auction.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there is a rule, I'm not aware. It was merely to point out the availability of a rare and valuable card.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
while "outing" an auction is frowned upon, there's NO absolute rule that I'm aware of on Net54...unwritten rule ??? perhaps, but while discouraged/considered taboo, there's nothing concrete that I know of - and YES, while I've personally been scolded/motherf**ked in the past for such a transgression, I've voluntarily elected to avoid any backlash/bullsh!t and NOT post such things, yet NOT because it was expressly forbidden... p.s. - it's a freakin' T206 Plank - those lookin' are unlikely to miss/overlook a T206 Plank... JMO. DS |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've only seen a Plank once before.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
When members here post in BST, these discussions are not suppose to take place other than PM's. From what I gather, E-Bay is fair game to discuss issues such as these.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats a whole different issue Irv. We should not be spamming BST listings with opinions or discussions, unless it's to ask a question about the card, or perhaps just to say nice card. I even saw a guy make an offer on one of Peter's listings right in the thread. Proper etiquette would be to PM an offer less than list price.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Paraphrasing the Bible: I try not to point out specks in another's eye, lest I have a Plank in my own.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
The paper loss on the right boarder looks like whiteout.
I really don't get how this is a two . I'm not sure if the price changes much from a one or a two I feel like a authentic slab would be just as good . You know this is excaly what the issue with graded cards is. It's one point but it's a completely what everyone was saying with the 1953 topps mays psa 10 . That card was given a 10 just because it is a condition sensitive set .
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed. Funny how we continue to see regular grading discrepancies like this even with big name cards. Although the birth of grading with PSA and Bill Mastro's trimmed Wagner ushered in the initial controversy more than 25 years ago. PSA in particular seems to be wildly inconsistent on how they change standards over time. At the end of the day I suppose it just goes to show that excellence (or NM or VG or G or P...) is in the eye of the beholder, even among professional graders. I'll stick with how I learned to grade from hobby publications in the 1980's. I don't at all get how a card with paper loss like that (or whiteout or whatever it is...) would be a 2; any other T-206 common like that probably would have been a 1 all day long.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 09-07-2016 at 05:10 AM. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515 Last edited by RedsFan1941; 09-07-2016 at 09:53 AM. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess I need to save up for many years and then cash in when the time is right.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 09-07-2016 at 10:05 AM. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
agree
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What you are thinking of is the belief that many of the Lajoie cards were sent to collectors paperclipped to a letter, so many of the '33 Goudey Lajoie cards will exhibit a paperclip indentation.
Last edited by CW; 09-07-2016 at 02:01 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Piggybacking PWCC on Ebay | CardMD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-26-2016 02:40 PM |
| PWCC & eBay - help us improve the hobby | Brent Huigens | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 142 | 02-01-2016 08:09 PM |
| pwcc eBay account suspended? | benderbroeth | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 4 | 12-28-2014 01:37 PM |
| pwcc ebay | baker85 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-04-2014 08:53 PM |
| Auction house Plank vs Ebay Plank PSA 5 | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-04-2013 01:35 AM |