|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
no it's a long story and without getting into the weeds, I was told by the PSA rep who talked to the grader the reason for the 3.5 (because as you can imagine I was pretty incredulous)
P.S. I don't think my card should be a 7 by any stretch but a 5 or 5.5 is well within reason given all I've seen over the years. Against better judgement, I tried to cross in a SGC holder because of the card value and felt they were being punitive.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time. Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 10-20-2016 at 02:47 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
You need to review again if what you are saying is 100% accurate and there is no surface issue on the card.
|
![]() |
|
|