![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Your pics don't work for me but anything with PL or a hole I believe will grade a PR-1 as far as I know?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any hole (that's not supposed to be there) should garner a Poor 1, but if he says it doesn't go through to the back, then it's considered paper loss. I can't see the images either, but my guesses are that if it's within the image itself, probably best grade would be a 2. If it's in a small and within a white border, maybe go up to a 3.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Paper loss on the back is graded less harshly. I have a Ryan rookie with a cm sized (sorry I'm suddenly European) rectangle missing from the back that graded a PSA 3.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a Venezuelan with paper loss on front that's graded a 2. I don't think PSA will grade it any higher than that.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It almost looks like a dent opposed to paper loss, I would still send it in and see, this might be an exception based on what it is? Although it won't be a high grade.
Last edited by BobbyBhockey; 11-16-2016 at 07:53 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably end up as the best "2" you will ever see.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd grade it a 4 but it will probably end up a 2.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
![]() |
|
|