|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
That depends ...Is your Conundrum wrapped in an Enigma?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Frank, yes, "we all know value (price) is influenced by both condition and scarcity of an item." However, you failed to mention that value (price) is also greatly influenced by the DEMAND for an item. If Item A were in a set that has next to no collector demand, I'd go to bed (with or without J.A.) - I have a few such cards, and they aren't worth anything remotely close to $20K. But, if Item A were in a popular set, I'm a +1 to what Leon said.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Demand for J. A. is a variable, Val, with no guarantee that either you or she can deliver.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where's the conundrum the answer is clearly B.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is essentially the plot dilemma in Flaubert's Bibliomania short story.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whatever became of the blue Old Mill ....
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Indeed Frank had a very sentimental education.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do not think B is a viable answer to the conundrum. If the market has valued card A with two known copies at $20,000 and an Auction that is live at the moment is verifying the market value then I do not believe that reducing the population by one you would dramatically increase the price. Just like finding 2 more of card A almost certainly not dramatically reduce the current market price.
Demand for the card would remain constant and supply reduced by 50% with constant demand might cause the card to shift slightly higher just as an increase of supply would cause a small downshift in price. So destroying the second known copy would almost certainly result in economic loss. Over Time that might not be true but the immediate impact would be negative. And no real collector of Baseball cards would rather have one card when he could have two.. JMHO Jonathan |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If anyone is contemplating destroying a 21,000 dollar card as a result of this thread, I can refer you to get the therapy you need. That's a better deal than Flaubert offered.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
When you bid on the second copy of your card you are also simultaneously setting the value of the first copy -- both of them really. So every dollar you bid is another dollar in your pocket. It's free money. You're literally playing with the house money. No need to destroy the second copy -- you've got two worth half!
Or something like that...
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Buyer's conundrum ... | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-18-2016 06:57 PM |
| Are you a set collector or a top 10 cards collector | g_vezina_c55 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 04-27-2013 11:11 AM |
| Conundrum!!! | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-22-2012 12:34 AM |
| COLLECTOR GRADE 50's Stuff, Singles, Collector condition. Ryan RC PSA 4.5 Banks PSA 5 | Sean1125 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 05-06-2012 10:55 AM |
| Ebay feedback conundrum | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-30-2011 05:17 PM |