 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-26-2017, 05:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
from another plate scratch sheet. There are four that have scratches that cross each other from different directions on three different sheets. There is a Seymour on this sheet Semour%201a_1.jpg Sheet%20F-B%20Highlighted.jpg A Doyle and Stone on this sheet Doyle%202_1.jpgStone%202_1.jpg Sheet%20C-D%20Highlighted%20-%20Copy%20-%20Copy.jpg And a Cobb on this sheet Cobb%20_bat_%202.jpg Sheet%20F%20-A%20Highlighted.jpg I'm not sure if this is what you're referring to with your other question but the back of the sheet in this thread was used for two different fronts so there are two subjects with the same scratch for each position. 
|
|
#2
01-26-2017, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. I am referring ones that you have shown.
I still see room for some of them to be transposed with other positions, but admittedly haven't studied everything THAT hard to take an opposing view.
|
|
#3
01-27-2017, 02:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
attachment.jpg Weimer-Pastorius-Criger-Davis.jpgWeimer-Pastorius-Hinchman-Sheckard.jpg Powell-Goode-Hinchman-Sheckard.jpgPowell-Goode-Criger-Davis.jpg There is also a miscut SC150 Sheckard that shows part of Wilbur Goode. Sheckard-Goode SC150.jpg
|
|
#4
05-18-2017, 07:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just picked up a new previously unconfirmed Weimer scratch that fits
the pattern of one of the three rows of scratches on this sheet. The scratches from this row are difficult to spot because this scratch is consistently much lighter than the other two. img257.jpg img259.jpg Sheet [A-B] X Large updated.jpg
|
|
#5
05-23-2017, 05:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice work here, Pat.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#6
05-24-2017, 02:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some of the cards in your image don't have any marks on them. How are you determining that those players go in those spots? Assuming miss cut cards and double names?
Also, your analysis would mean that they printed 2 piedmont 150 sheets of 4 rows of 17 and 1 sheet with a 9th row of 20. What is the theory on the remaining cards? 17 plus the 3 wonders(Magie, Plank and Wagner)?
|
|
#7
05-24-2017, 10:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I made this sheet by connecting existing scratches to give me an idea on location and subjects for unconfirmed scratches. If there is no X then that scratch is currently unconfirmed. There are two subjects for each scratch one is a SC649 subject and the other a non 649 subject the Red are the 649's and the Blue are non 649 subjects that are confirmed. For example there should be a Pastorius scratch that matches this new weimer and next to that scratch there is an unconfirmed scratch that should be found on Criger and H. Davis (circled on the image below). Sheet [A-B] X Large updated Criger-Davis.jpg I think I might be confusing some people with the three different scratches. The vertical location of these scratches are just for my research I don't know where they were on the sheet and the middle one is short because I haven't found any scratches on the right side to connect to yet. If in your first question your referring to the areas with no scratches there are other plate scratch sheets that indicate at least 12 vertical rows with the same subject, this is just my opinion but I think all of the plate scratch sheets had the same vertical subject for the whole sheet. As far as the sheet size and Magie, Plank and Wagner. There were a few different printings for the PD150 sheets and several changes were made so the number isn't actually 156 for the sheets. Magie was changed to Magee so that would only count as one. There are a few PD150 Plank's and Wagner's but they are scraps. Crawford (throwing) was a late addition and Lundgren (Chicago) and Jennings (Portrait) were later additions. Personally I think there were a few different size sheets although I do think all of the PD150 sheets with the scratches were printed close to the same time and were probably the same size. Because of the amount of T206's that were printed I also think it's reasonable to consider that there were sheets printed at some of the other facility's owned by American Lithograph at the time not just their original NY facility. img272.jpg img272 - Copy.jpg img272 - Copy (2).jpg Last edited by Pat R; 05-24-2017 at 10:31 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Just wondering about printing techniques giving further insight to T206 page layout. | iwantitiwinit | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-05-2014 07:27 AM |
| E92 or other E Card Set Layout | Jaybird | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2012 08:00 PM |
| 1910 Baseball Sheet Music - Complete | IronHorse2130 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2010 09:55 AM |
| W504 Brroklyn Complete Sheet | jim | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2010 08:49 PM |
| 1948 LEAF complete on an uncut sheet | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 15 | 08-24-2007 07:15 AM |
Hybrid Mode
