NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2017, 06:06 PM
Touch'EmAll's Avatar
Touch'EmAll Touch'EmAll is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,113
Default Jumbo Wagner

The most interesting miscut card i have ever seen is the famous Jumbo T206 Honus Wagner PSA 5 (mc). It is not off-center. And it is not worse than off-center, which is what most every (mc) is - worse than off-center. But hey, if PSA says its (mc), then it must be, right? PSA must have figured it has abnormal top/bottom measurement, and that is the reason they slabbed it (mc). Ok, I can sort of maybe see the PSA's reasoning, but I still disagree and it should not be with (mc) qualifier. Then again, who the heck am I.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2017, 06:08 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 100backstroke View Post
The most interesting miscut card i have ever seen is the famous Jumbo T206 Honus Wagner PSA 5 (mc). It is not off-center. And it is not worse than off-center, which is what most every (mc) is - worse than off-center. But hey, if PSA says its (mc), then it must be, right? PSA must have figured it has abnormal top/bottom measurement, and that is the reason they slabbed it (mc). Ok, I can sort of maybe see the PSA's reasoning, but I still disagree and it should not be with (mc) qualifier. Then again, who the heck am I.
i wouldn't kick the jumbo wags out of my bed...errr collection!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2017, 06:15 PM
MVSNYC MVSNYC is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,812
Default

2 grades lower has been the usual rule of thumb. Given the choice here, I'd probably take the 5.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2017, 09:25 AM
Buythatcard's Avatar
Buythatcard Buythatcard is offline
Howard Chernick
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,658
Default

I believe that I read in the past that if you ask a grading company not to include the qualifier, they would return the card at a lower grade. So, a PSA 7 (MC) might come back a PSA 5.

For those of you who say that they would never collect a card with a qualifier, would you now collect the PSA 5 version? At this point, you can't be 100% sure that this card originally had a qualifier.

Are you referring to cards that are labeled with a qualifier?
__________________
Please visit my eBay store:

Buythatcard

http://stores.ebay.com/Buythatcard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2017, 09:33 AM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,588
Default

Grading quantifies an opinion.

Hedging qualifies an opinion.

Perhaps the TPGs should just use an asterisk instead of qualifiers.

But then some would argue that all cards deserve an asterisk.

Problem solved *
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2017, 10:56 AM
Yoda Yoda is offline
Joh.n Spen.cer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,360
Default

At the National last summer I submitted a really nice T206 Wallace PSA 7mc to SGC, hoping to crossover to a straight 7. They very nicely told me they would grade it a 6 but not the coveted 7. I declined and still have the card. I guess I could break it out and submit it raw to SGC and see what happens. That is if I can be bothered.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: Michael jordan 101 star card bgs 7.5 and higher grade Forever Young Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T 0 04-06-2015 11:44 PM
Will TPG tell you why are card won't grade higher? bn2cardz Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 20 08-18-2012 01:30 AM
Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back? Pat R Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 05-26-2012 04:52 PM
WTB: Low to mid-grade T206 w/qualifier freakhappy Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 08-13-2011 11:43 PM
Have You Ever Had A Card Grade Higher After Resubmission? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 19 03-24-2008 10:39 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.


ebay GSB