|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am proposing a paradigm shift. I am not saying they were improperly graded according to the grading standards. I am saying grading standards are flawed and should be revamped. Somewhere along the line, grading companies need to consider overall appearance and presentation if they are going to be the measuring stick of our hobby.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Edited to add the following question: Do you think PSA or any other reputable grading company would have graded the 2 T3 Cobbs any differently? Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 02-16-2017 at 08:13 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I say keep the grades low all day. I picked this card up for a ridiculous discount all because some people can't live without the half percent of the card that's missing:
![]()
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anyone have any tips to removing ink? I have a Robinson I want to keep for my collection. Can you soak mid 50's topps cards? No malicious intentions guys, just trying to improve my collection without paying up for big cards.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my personal experience SGC will grade a card as high as a SGC 40/3 VG with paper loss. I had a Babe Ruth that was otherwise easily NrMint get a VG grade because of a speck of paper loss on the right border the size of a pin head.
I will complain that i mailed off 119 cards to SGC to get graded 58 days ago and still are not done.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
As previously stated, eye appeal and technical grading are two completely different categories. Buy the card, not the grade, unless you're doing a set registry.
Side note: I don't really care about SGC inconsistencies, as long as they have the beautiful slab with the black interior. It's the sole reason I go with them for Pre-War. Again, eye appeal.
__________________
Just a dad trying to figure out how to build a collection his kids will take interest in. Interests: HoF, Grover Hartley, Cleveland, Jim Thome, Jose Ramirez, Akron Zips, Historically Significant Figures Cooperstown Project Progress: 202/351 - 57.55% Follow along and see what I need here. YouTube Channel: Collecting America's Pastime |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT: Consistent Team Batting Averages | oldjudge | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-26-2015 08:03 PM |
| Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 06:09 PM |
| Goodwin Auction T216 Honus Wagner - consistent grading??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2006 11:58 AM |
| PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 08:14 AM |