|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which would you chose and why | |||
| PSA 5.5 to PSA 6 Green Cobb |
|
118 | 49.58% |
| PSA 2.5 to PSA 3 52 Topps Mantle |
|
105 | 44.12% |
| Neither, get solar panels and save money |
|
15 | 6.30% |
| Voters: 238. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Also consider eye appeal.
A PSA 2.5 to 3 Mantle is getting near the beater class, and toss in poor centering then the card would have poor eye appeal. Then a 5.5 to 6 Cobb Green - Wow! could actually be a very nice eye pleasing card exhibiting solid coloring, nice focus, well centered, clean boarders, and high end for the issue status as well. As far as just nice to look at...the Cobb. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I was buying a card strictly for investment, it would be Ruth, all day every day. He is king....hands down.
The argument that Mantle prices will drop once baby boomers die off is silly. One could easily have made the same argument for all the pre-war players, but look where we are.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strictly investment. That is the conversation. Prediction is not required. It is a guess with reasoning. I am curious to hear the reasoning behind your guess given this exact choice, and only this choice, with only this motivation.
Ruth is not on the discussion block and not an option in the poll. It is not about the player. Only about the card. Last edited by PhillipAbbott79; 03-03-2017 at 05:33 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am going to be that one guy who picks solar panels. Over time you should be able to get your money back and buy one of the cards anyway, right?
__________________
Br.ia.n Ho.rn.e |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I voted for the Cobb for two reasons:
First, I try not to purchase cards with grades less than EX Secondly, the '52 Mantle is WAY overpriced!
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your cost is always jacked for Topps 52, so you have to pay more up front, in my mind. Your return is mitigated by upfront cost. Also T206 collectors, collect different ways. They will do HOF subsets, or team subsets , or you can just pick the 4 poses. There will always be demand for the Cobb.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
you have a very nice Mantle. undergraded. something to hold on to
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting topic. I have been a "T206 guy" for 25 years, and have owned some pretty cool cards. I've toiled with this very question, the one posed by the OP. Last year I decided to "branch-out" and invest in one (killer) card. I chose a clean, centered 52 Topps Mantle, a grade slightly higher than the OP mentioned. I'm very happy with it. It's incredibly iconic and gives you the chills when holding it. I would LOVE a nice Green Cobb (as I'm a big T206 collector), but, at the end of the day...a 52 Mantle, is a 52 Mantle.
Last edited by MVSNYC; 03-03-2017 at 10:24 PM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree 100%. But, at the end of the day, this is pretty subjective stuff: cards, artwork, cars, women....and so on and so forth.
{This was intended as a response to MVSYNC. Sorry.} Last edited by mark evans; 03-04-2017 at 06:44 AM. Reason: placement |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When I first seen it, I was thinking 6-7, not 3.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
While still extremely visually appealing, I see a faint amount of paper loss on the upper right corner.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's the thing...if we're talking purely for an investment. It's all about supply and demand. Both cards have great demand, but there's a far larger audience for the Mantle, it crosses over outside of the Hobby...Yes there's less green cobbs, but he has a specific niche audience. And this is coming from a passionate T206 collector.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
indeed
The 52 Topps Mantle is arguably the face card of the hobby
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very arguably, as when someone hears I enjoy the hobby, they ask if I've had a t206...Wagner. now its the Same series as the Cobb, but their second question is usually about a 52 mantle. Over the last 10 years the Mantle has performed better at almost a rate of 2-1 I have skin in both games, I cant help but feel in the current market that the Mantle has really peaked, whereas the Cobb has room to grow.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB T206 Red Cobb with EPDG Back and T213 Red Cobb Coupon Type 3 | Blunder19 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 12-03-2013 11:06 PM |
| t206 cobb, young and 51 Mantle RC | hunterdutchess | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-22-2011 05:44 PM |
| 51 Mantle RC, t206 Cobb, Young | hunterdutchess | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 08-22-2011 10:44 AM |
| lower price! t206's, t205's, t205 cobb, w. johnson,'53 psa 2 mantle + for only $900 | benderbroeth | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 15 | 07-14-2011 08:33 AM |
| 2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-13-2002 06:40 PM |