Utter Frustration:

Does scarcity equal that sort of value in this case? I'm sorry, I'm just not familiar with the player or the card.

[oldjudge]

Make a nice photocopy and congratulate yourself on saving $5500. There may be no one in the world who values the card as highly as you do. If someday you decide to sell it you will probably take a big hit. Save the money--skip the card.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Make a serious, well thought out offer, win the card and be a legend. If the offer does not work out, wait and cherish a more deserved victory.

[bigfish]

I agree with Jay... You are exactly what the seller is looking for. Turn the tables...offer 1850.00 and say it's good for 12 hours.

[VintageBen]

you could buy a nice 1933 goudey #144 babe ruth for that price. Yes, this might be a great family piece. But what if you had to sell it how much would one pay for it?

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by bigfish

I agree with Jay... You are exactly what the seller is looking for. Turn the tables...offer 1850.00 and say it's good for 12 hours.

Obviously I imagine book price is insufficient and it should go for significantly more, but is 5x NM value for a FAIR card rational? In 2012 REA sold a common in 3 for $1600. A Whitt Wyatt SGC 60 went for $2250. A Bobby Morgan raw in VG sold by Huggins and Scott in 2015 went for $2800 the the same card popped up in an REA a year later in 2016 now actually graded SGC 40 and it sold for $2040. They don't come up often so that should help set the market, and they are all significantly nicer than the card in question. Also SGC has graded at least 2 Wyatts and PSA has graded 2. If you offer him the book NM price he should jump on it.

[swarmee]

And he never needs to sell it; a rare card like that would be a family heirloom...

[Jewish-collector]

I agree with Jay. Offer much less and in the comment box to the seller type, "Here is my offer. Sometimes you gotta say not no, but !@#$%$ no.

[Bored5000]

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

Obviously I imagine book price is insufficient and it should go for significantly more, but is 5x NM value for a FAIR card rational? In 2012 REA sold a common in 3 for $1600. A Whitt Wyatt SGC 60 went for $2250. A Bobby Morgan raw in VG sold by Huggins and Scott in 2015 went for $2800 the the same card popped up in an REA a year later in 2016 now actually graded SGC 40 and it sold for $2040. They don't come up often so that should help set the market, and they are all significantly nicer than the card in question. Also SGC has graded at least 2 Wyatts and PSA has graded 2. If you offer him the book NM price he should jump on it.

PWCC also sold a PSA 5 Felin's Franks of John Meyer for $2,150 last month. Felin's Franks cards are quite scarce, but it is a thin market once the price gets above a few hundred dollars. The Meyer card had only three bidders over $503 and just two bidders over $974.

That asking price is wildly optimistic. I can sympathize with the OP. I think many of us have cards that we have wanted for a long time that sit on eBay forever at insane BINs.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1955-Felins-...p2047675.l2557

[Exhibitman]

As a frequent recipient of those sorts of emails from wannabe buyers on rare cards my response is right in my listing:

--I do not "have to" sell you my item for the price you dictate.* My wife is the only one who gets to say I "have to" do something, and she says it plenty.*

--I am well aware of what the market is for most anything I sell; trying to "educate" me on pricing is not a negotiation tool, it is just a tool tool.

--While I am certainly appreciative of your personal or familial connection to a particular item, it is not a reason for me to give you a discount.* A crasser person than I would even consider it a reason to raise the price.*

[1952boyntoncollector]

We all take losses on things that we like. This is a hobby. Some people spend $5000 on other hobbys with zero chance of recouping that cost. Lets say someone likes to spend money traveling and spends $6000 on a cruise and not the cheaper one for $1000. Thats a $5,000 difference that is gone forever except the pictures you take on the cruise.

Someone may want to pay $5,000 more than someone ever would on a card. The answer just shouldnt always be 'what its worth'. If there was one 1983 topps signed card available of a guy that played for 1 year and it happened to be my brother, i know i would pay thousands more than the 'market' (market being other signed 1983 cards with POP of 1 with same type of player)

Anyway, the only issue i would have if i am going to pay thousands more than the next guy is the chances of seeing another one at auction in the next year or two or whatever time table i am good with. If i am confident another item wont come up for the next 10 years, that would allow me to pay more etc

[icollectDCsports]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Make a nice photocopy and congratulate yourself on saving $5500. There may be no one in the world who values the card as highly as you do. If someday you decide to sell it you will probably take a big hit. Save the money--skip the card.

Agree.

[swarmee]

I saw that one pop up, and as a Georgia Tech collector, appreciated it. If you want to buy it, I will toss in $100 PayPal.

[clydepepper]

Originally Posted by Gobucsmagic74

Does scarcity equal that sort of value in this case? I'm sorry, I'm just not familiar with the player or the card.

This card would be worth more to me as a family member. The Standard Catalog of Vintage Baseball Cards, 3rd Edition (2013) lists the card at 1,250 in NM condition.

As a player, Wyatt had a decent career, capped off with the 1941 Brooklyn Dodgers when he went 22-10; led the league in shuouts; one the only World Series game the Dodgers won against the Yankees.

He was also the Atlanta Braves' first pitching coach.