babe ruth m101-5 blank back $294,000

[Leon]

Originally Posted by nolemmings

No, there are not a lot of people who believe the m101-4/5 Ruth is not his rookie card. There is you and virtually no one else. I asked you, more than once when you started this nonsense a couple of years ago, to tell us what you believe Ruth's rookie card to be---silence. Crickets. Nada.

Many could at least understand if you chose the Baltimore News card, but we both know you can't/won't go there. Come on, put it out there. I'm waiting for the Peter Chao answer of 1933 Goudey.

'33 Goudey? That would be the totally idiotic Beckett answer. The Sporting News cards Jay mentioned are clearly his rookie cards endorsed by most knowledgeable hobbyists ....his Baltimore card is a pre-rookie card.

[yanksfan09]

I'll happily take anyone's m101-4's off them if they're unhappy with them or having doubts...

[Vintageclout]

Originally Posted by yanksfan09

I'll happily take anyone's m101-4's off them if they're unhappy with them or having doubts...

The M101-5 & M101-4 Ruth's are BOTH his 1916 rookie cards....game....set....match....no dscussion necessary!

[yanksfan09]

Originally Posted by Vintageclout

The M101-5 & M101-4 Ruth's are BOTH his 1916 rookie cards....game....set....match....no dscussion necessary!

Agreed.

[Jdoggs]

Originally Posted by Vintageclout

The M101-5 & M101-4 Ruth's are BOTH his 1916 rookie cards....game....set....match....no dscussion necessary!

True dat! Ruth is the GOAT perhaps of all sports!