![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A7 is good and is a number they'd give to a bat they think is game used.. I'd have to see the specifics for the bat, but the grading does take off points for non-authenticity qualities such as damage. For example, if a jersey is considered perfectly authentic, but the number has been repaired, they will deduct a point(s) for that. They deduct a point(s) if a bat is cracked. If the bat is cracked it won't receive an A10, even if MEARS took the bat from the player's hand right after he left the batter's box. So deduction in points may have nothing to do with their opinion of the authenticity itself, and MEARS's final grades are a curious conglomeration of authenticity and condition. I guess they want a 10 to be perfect example of the bat in all ways.
For modern player jerseys (I think post 1987), without provenance tying the jersey to the player the highest grade received is a 5. That's because modern pro model jerseys were sold retail to the public. Thus, a higher grade jersey has a photo match, team player or related provenance documentation along with it. Different stories with bats, though. Last edited by drcy; 04-16-2017 at 10:11 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you both. I think it was given a five for player characteristics/factory records and 2 for use. I think the missing points may have been for provenance? It has a Celebz Direct sticker on it, but it probably didn't come directly from the team. It's signed by the player and was reasonably priced, so I thought I'd gamble on it. Great to know regarding the grading though.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They actually have records of the players' bats orders, so know what exact and the number of bats (including all the details including weight, etc) the players ordered. So they can say "This is exactly the type and details of bat the player would use."
Last edited by drcy; 04-16-2017 at 10:27 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not a fan of any of the authenticating/grading companies, but it seems to me the amount of usage is usually what pushes a bat to a 9. I'm assuming your bat is NOT partucularly "hammered"?
__________________
if you can help with SF Giants items (no cards), let me send you my wantlist! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have it in hand yet but from the pictures it looks like it saw good use but is far from hammered. The auction pictures from the auction aren't the best, but I don't think it's the type of bat anyone would fake.
I do appreciate everyone's thoughts. I've got a decent game used collection but it's primarily modern Yankees stuff. So, I usually just check for a Steiner cert and pull the triggger. Trying to educate myself more on the non-Steiner stuff though.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question regarding authenticated checks | Westsiders | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 12-19-2014 01:48 PM |
MEARS Auctions Ends Saturday, September 29th, 2012 - Many Authenticated Autographs | MEARSAUCTIONS | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 09-29-2012 02:39 PM |
Question on getting a signed bb authenticated | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-31-2012 06:01 PM |
Question Regarding MEARS / Legendary Photos | ejharrington | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 11-26-2010 12:30 PM |