|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed it's the REGISTRY which makes PSA holders treated like a commodity. Thus the term buy the card, and not the holder is coined. Recently I met a die hard PSA member. He was explaining to me about their different membership levels and what you get for each level. Most Every time he gets a card in a non PSA holder or he gets a grade he feels isn't fair, he cracks it out and he resubmits it.
I asked him how many times he has done this. He said it's in the thousands and I asked him how many he did this month and he said around 200. He went on to explain how PSA used to be real easy to crack, but they have improved their holders now which makes him use his band saw in the basement. SGC are simple to crack as two quick pops on each top corner normally does the trick. The population numbers within a couple of years will almost be impossible to trust, if not even now. As a collector, I still have tons of cards I bought back in the 90s and early 2000s which are raw. This was before TPGs even had a holder big enough to grade larger cards like Postcards and Cabinets. If/when I decide to sell, I will most likely use whatever TPG has the best reputation and give me a chance to fetch the best final price. Right now PSA is king of the TPGs. We are paying for their "opinion" on the grade of cardboard they say it is. It doesn't matter if SGC has better holders, better graders, a better owner, etc.... I would love to see SGC become the new industry Giant for grading. To do this they would have to have PSA self destruct which I don't see happening and SGC would really have to come up with an innovative registry system which would become the new norm. (Hi John glad to see you posting)
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. Last edited by BeanTown; 04-27-2017 at 11:41 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Found this old thread somehow…unfortunately PSA self destructed and cards in their cases still bring the extra 30%. I really don’t understand what it will take for sgc to surpass them (or Beckett) but I sure wish they would! Let’s all exclusively buy SGC cards on ebay and shift this thing! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
As long as there no csg holders horrible cant give them away garbage
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, at least one of the companies is trying to use AI for grading and not people. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-11-2021 at 08:48 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And yes...the options we currently have are shit! Don't hold your breath for that to change. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That sucks and our options shrink as we think they would expand with competition
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
1) The people driving the markets are not collectors. PSA cards are a deeper and more active market, so it is self-affirming feedback loop.
2) the registry. this really matters. 3) the general population of card buyers is not well-educated. Not a lot of research/effort is done. How many people understand that the grading scales have changed? not many. People pay the price of today's "4s" for any slab with a "4" on it not realizing the card would grade a 3 and maybe a 2 today. I see it everyday. but yes. from a pure grading / quality standpoint there is no difference between PSA and SGC. I don't think any other grader is their league.
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey Collecting: T206 Monster #236 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eewwww!! I wouldnt grade your yum yum either!
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL....then you are as smart as them. Two of the three grading companies graded it correctly. SGC first said it was counterfeit, then they gave it a NO....Such is life. It was real as the day is long. And whomever paid over 7k for it probably thought so too.
,
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
the Ruth Fro-Joy's were distributed from August 6-11 in 1928 this ad ran just after that on august 30 1928. img839.jpg img839 - Copy.jpg img839 - Copy (2).jpg |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I’m a baseball card collector; not an investor or flipper. My intended holding period is my life, so I never sell a card unless I upgrade it. I prefer SGC over PSA - grading, value (when purchasing a card), the flip, and overall presentation.
As a collector, I love that SGC cards are cheaper. It allows me to obtain more cards and/or higher graded cards with my collecting budget. For selfish reasons, I hope SGC never reaches par with PSA. I’ll gladly pay a discounted price for an SGC 5 v. a PSA 5 - all things considered, e.g. same centering, eye appeal, etc. |
![]() |
|
|