|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's very clear collectors are prioritizing eye appeal above numerical grade. As evidence from what I was watching: - I lost a Goodwins Champion Cap Anson SGC 1 (Poor) once it went above $3k. (beautiful front, though). - I also found it interesting that a CJ Cobb SGC 4 went for $18K, while an SGC 7 went for $22K. The 4 looked incredibly nice, and the bidding reflected the card IMO, not the grades. Last edited by mechanicalman; 05-01-2017 at 04:29 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
We're saying the Mantles are high now -- anyone want to wager if you sold those 51 and 52's two year from now -- they would sell at a profit. In today's world -- I'll wager they would.
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
T3 cobbs, cjs, t206 grn prt cobbs seem very strong
e107s seemed low... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought so too on the E107s (said the guy who bought a long-sought Monte Cross
).I was surprised that the T3 Lennox went for so much (PSA 5 for $3600) - I have a very nice raw copy that I think perhaps I ought to get graded. As the owner of a T205 blank back I was also surprised/happy to see the Krause blank back hit $2040. I don't know much about them, but I thought the OJ cabinets would go for more.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
It depends. If they sell at an AH where nobody knows who the bidders are and non-payments are not disclosed, sure; everything goes up with those methods.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Tough to say. I really don't subscribe to the "buy high, sell higher" mentality, but Mantles have just gone nuts.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The PSA 4 1951 Mantle in REA had great eye appeal for the grade.
The SGC 4 CJ Cobb also looked dynamite. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The gorgeous 1914 CJ Walter Johnson PSA 5 ($20,400).
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The silks colored - W. Johnson sgc 84 and Matty sgc 80 seemed quite low. They gotta be a couple of the finest copies anywhere.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I fully agree with Matt. Both have awesome eye appeal. Centered iconic cards like these have a life of their own.
jeff |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
First day cover with the HOFer autos.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anyone else surprised by the babe Ruth signed balls pricing? Have those gone up? I was watching the multi signed ball with young Cobb and babe and Wagner. Etc.
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was thinking the same thing. I have seen this exact cover listed before, not sure where.
Now it went for $144,000.00
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Pleasant Surprise | herbc | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 4 | 01-23-2017 11:48 AM |
| Much to my surprise.....M & P 302-2 | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 06-10-2008 08:23 PM |
| Someone is in for an unpleasant surprise | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-18-2005 05:50 PM |
| Surprise, Surprise the King has.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-04-2004 09:19 AM |
| to my surprise | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-07-2002 04:46 PM |