|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's always the guys with no money telling the rest of us how dumb we are to spend big money on high grade cards. They have yet to figure out that no one listens to investment advice from guys with no money.
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 05-06-2017 at 10:03 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow! Somebody sure did a nice job doctoring that card Jeff!
Cheers, Patrick
__________________
__________________ Looking for 1923 W572 Walt Barbare and Pat Duncan. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is no doubt that there are cards out there that are so rare that the card in any condition can perform quite well. That said of those examples once again the higher you go up the grading scale the better the performance will be. Human behavior in many cases is very easy to predict and when it comes to things of value the higher up the food chain you go, they want collectibles that could impress others who share their level of wealth. For years on the CU board I have discussed the 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle in a PSA 10. I believe that if one comes available it is very likely to land in the hands of a non card collector. Someone with roots to the 1950's and 60's Yankees who has vast wealth and would love to showcase such a rare specimen in their 60th floor penthouse. Quite frankly the higher the price goes the more they will want it as the bragging rights associated with such a card only go up as the price does.
I continue to be puzzled by the notion that some suggest that cards aren't investments. You may not view your collection as an investment but in the real world anything that can be called a store of value is an investment. In 1985 when I began first purchasing cards Dwight Gooden was all of the rage. A pack of 1985 Topps was $0.35 and the goal as a kid was to buy a pack and get cards that were worth more than your $0.35. If you did your investment made money. If it didn't you lost and felt sorry for yourself and had to scrounge up some more funds to play the lottery again. All of the kids in my neighborhood couldn't wait for that months Beckett to come out and see if our collections were gaining value. The card market is very much like the stock market. You have a huge number of choices and varying degrees of risk. On one hand you have long term winners that using history as a guide have done well over time all the way to registry cards that are more like penny stocks with some paying off but most going down overtime as the populations increase. The modern market would be considered very high risk but with that risk level, some will produce massive gains while most will fizzle out and be worth a fraction of their value in the future. People buying cards that are $5,000 or perhaps $10,000 or higher are definitely in almost all cases concerned about the value. It may not be their primary motive for purchase but if one thinks that someone is interested in buying a card for that sum and watching it dwindle down to a few hundred bucks they are simply mistaken. The run that many cards have had since I got back into cards in 2009 is staggering. As the prices have risen it has given many more resources to use for other purchases and confidence in their ability to invest in the card market. The term investment shouldn't be considered a bad word when it comes to cards. It takes real resources to purchase them and unless ones funds are simply unlimited it isn't even rational to not want them to hold their price and hopefully increase. I started sending cards to PSA in early 2010 and I have never participated in anything where the upside is so much greater than the downside. It is incredible that you can send cards to a grading company and simply pay a fee and instantaneously have the potential to wildly increase their value. There are countless collectors and dealers who have 100 baggers on cards. Find me a stock that you can buy and have this happen. I am in the stock business and trust me it is incredibly difficult to pick big winners but even more difficult to hold them and ride them for long periods because at some point you buckle and sell. The other feature that cards offer is they can't go to zero. Even players like Barry Bonds who was on the perennial cold list have seen their higher graded cards make a huge resurgence. Combining fun, nostalgia, competition and investing in one hobby is incredible and one of the primary reasons that more people are entering the hobby and that people are willing to pony up larger sums to participate. It is true that most cards aren't what you would classify as safe investments but those making very strategic bets on marque pieces have done extremely well over time and that isn't going to change. Last edited by Dpeck100; 05-06-2017 at 12:59 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't usually say people spending big on high grade cards are dumb. In some situations I'm not sure it's a good investment. Of course, I've had that same opinion of those cards, in some cases since they were new. (86 Fleer Jordan ) So you're probably right about some of my investment ideas. On the original topic of money in the hobby. It's one of those love/hate things. I've collected long enough that the prices between when I started and now are worlds apart. T206 Wagners were under 20K for sure, 52 Mantles were under 1000 even for a nice one. Would I like to return to that? Yes and no. Now that I've got "some money", at least the Mantle would be within reach, probably not the Wagner. (I could buy one at say 10K, but me and the card would be kicked out of the house shortly after ) And I'd love to get common T206s for $2 each with no regard for backs and not much for condition. But then, back then I hung out at a dealers a LOT. Sort of worked for them, and got to see a lot of collections come in. And saw a lot of those go back out because what the cards were worth to a dealer wasn't enough to overcome the "these were granddads cards". Yes, money has shut me out of some of the hobby, my own cheapness from a bit more. But if it wasn't for the money, a lot of that stuff would still be in attics and drawers, or would have been thrown out. Would the Black Swamp find have been sold into the hobby if the cards were worth a dollar each? Maybe maybe not. And yes, wherever there's money there are crooks. But overall, I think the hobby has benefitted from the money. Steve B |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bamboozling the wife" appears to be a theme that runs through many threads. My wife and I have avoided money issues over 30+ years by never combining our finances. Thus, she never complains about my purchases, nor I about hers (I once came home to find a new Cadillac SUV in the driveway.).
I realize this system would not work for all couples and, in particular, those where the wife works at home at child-rearing. Nevertheless, I mention it for the benefit of those collectors who may find it worthy of consideration. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting article about what happened to the Elvis Presley collectable market as the original Elvis fans start dying of old age. Will BB Cards see a similar depression in 20-30 years when people, like me, from the 70/80s boom start dying off?
https://www.theguardian.com/music/sh...eting-in-price
__________________
My wantlist http://www.oldbaseball.com/wantlists...tag=bdonaldson Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
probably be more evident in 40-50 years when most of us will be gone. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Elvis fans are aging out clearly. I'd also argue that Elvis hasn't held up particularly well over the decades. What he did doesn't seem quite so spectacular anymore. Ditto people like Bing Crosby. Sure it will be a good long while before people stop collecting Beatles stuff.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-08-2017 at 01:33 PM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A beater 1974 topps Dave Winfield rookie is a dollar etc. A beater Beater 1914 Cracker Jack Cobb still has real value.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 05-08-2017 at 01:31 PM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Good luck in your collecting, Larry |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I seriously doubt anyone in their right mind would argue the investment potential of that card, (not to mention the awesomeness), even a peasant like myself who could never legitimately afford the same card in poor condition. Congrats on your success in life and for putting us poor people in our proper place.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Highest regards, Larry |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hobby history: Card dealers of the 1960s: James T. Elder (+ hobby drama, 1968-69) | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-08-2017 06:23 PM |
| Make some extra money via your hobby! | Sean1125 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 2 | 08-03-2015 09:48 AM |
| Hobby Newsflash! Re: Top 250 Cards In Hobby | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-17-2014 05:08 PM |
| Not always...but sometimes, you should take the money | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-27-2011 11:39 AM |
| When you have no money.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-11-2005 11:28 AM |