![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For what it's worth, just because it's within the tolerance doesn't mean they will grade it exactly to that spec. The Puckett definitely will not get a 10, due to top-bottom centering. More likely an 8.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yea I don't it will too but I'll probably send it anyway if I get vouchers. On a side note I read on the PSA website that the Tony Fernandez cards are extremely hard to find above a PSA 9 (population 3, 0 higher) because of its location on the uncut sheet. I have two from these rack packs and I'm thinking of submitting them just because of their rarity to find good examples of them. These are well centered and in mint condition. Think because of their low population and hard to find in such a grade that they will be worth submitting? ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by dictoresno; 05-28-2017 at 07:25 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where's the defect??? Aaron rookie. | ullmandds | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 07-21-2016 05:51 PM |