|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like others have said the printing is terrible, particularly the Goudey trademark on the back of the card. It should be crystal clear.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like someone is in the market for a 60 day interest free loan.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Want to bet that he won't accept "? AUTH" as proof that it's a fake.
Stay far far far away from that one. Also, welcome! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was thinking the same thing. He really emphasizes that "proof" requirement. And since he knows that it's fake and is selling it anyway.... he has no intention of returning any money.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ole ?AUT angle. PSA needs to get their act together and change that. Surely their lawyers could come up with something better.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree. Since we're paying them for their expert opinion, they should be willing to come right out and say that a card is fake.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
They should change it from ?AUT to ?NAUT
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB 1934 Goudey green Gehrig or 1933 Goudey Lajoie | Tennis13 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-04-2016 03:07 PM |
| FS: 1933 Goudey Lajoie | Guttapercha | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 09-19-2012 04:17 PM |
| Lajoie Goudey 1933 in low grade | g_vezina_c55 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-11-2012 10:41 AM |
| 1933 Goudey Lajoie #106 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 12-21-2006 10:23 AM |
| Is this the same 1933 Goudey Lajoie as Leland's had? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-29-2003 09:05 PM |