 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-06-2017, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The main difference is that the Beckett graders look at the card while completely naked, hence the term "raw review." While it is fairly accurate, they tend to be self-conscious, especially at a major show, and sometime miss some flaws, especially if the air conditioning is turned up. Hope this helps.
__________________
Get my new book Baseball Cards at the Edge of War, 1941: The Games, The Gum and The Glory 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone ever have PSA damage a card on review? | KingFisk | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-13-2018 01:06 PM |
| Closed - 1968 Topps Tom Seaver Raw Card Review 5.5 | x2drich2000 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 09-23-2015 04:29 PM |
| Vintage Baseball Card book review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 08-22-2007 11:59 AM |
| About.com: Let's Review Their Baseball Card Timeline | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-23-2007 12:36 PM |
| Vintage PSA Graded Card Review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-10-2006 09:25 AM |
Threaded Mode