 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
09-16-2017, 03:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I'd vote that technically the guy is correct, but it's just a technicality if the card is advertised and shown as being entombed as authentic. Even if my view is correct, this falls under no harm, no foul.
I note that, personally, I've always considered a trimmed or otherwise altered card as a grade of Poor. But the grading companies don't do it that way (which would circle around to why I said the guy is technically correct). Last edited by drcy; 09-16-2017 at 03:39 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| let's have some fun w/ the word "shill" | begsu1013 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 114 | 02-04-2016 11:07 PM |
| When "The Bird" was the word | SAllen2556 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 22 | 10-28-2014 07:34 PM |
| The "auction" (for lack of a better word) is over. Look at what happened. | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 252 | 05-09-2014 02:08 PM |
| a word about editing of message titles | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-15-2006 01:48 PM |
| " He was black--take my word for it" ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-03-2002 07:04 PM |
Threaded Mode