 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-07-2017, 11:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
He may be saying that he would take the conversion of any 9(OC) to an 8. PSA will normally automatically downgrade a single grade drop due to any flaw, but return a Mint card that's heavily off-centered either 9(OC) or PSA 7 or below based on their listed requirements on that page:
PSA 7: 75/25 or better PSA 6: 80/20 or better PSA 5: 85/15 or better PSA 4: 85/15 again PSA 3: 90/10 or better PSA 2: 90/10 again PSA 1.5: 90/10 again PSA 1: Not miscut So a Gem Mint otherwise card that's 89/11 can supposedly only get a top non-qualified grade of PSA 3, or it would be a 9(OC). That's why I never select "No qualifiers." Why not take a much higher grade and registry set value? 9(Q) = 7 for the registy.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
#2
10-07-2017, 12:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA never removes the OC qualifier from their grade.
Yes you can get a no-grade, but they will never downgrade an 8 or 9 card due to centering, removing the OC. To do otherwise is fraudulent. They have never done this and never will. A card's attributes cannot be changed. It is what it is. And the submitter has no say in this. If you want your 8-OC to become a 7, then I suggest that you crack it out, damage a few corners, and resubmit.
__________________
Past transactions with ALR-Bishop, Fleerfan, Leerob538, Northviewcats, wondo, EconTeachert205 "Collectors were supposedly enjoying the pure hobby of baseball card collecting, but they were also concerned with the monetary value of their collections." House of Cards by John Bloom, 1997. Last edited by OlderTheBetter; 10-07-2017 at 12:51 PM.
|
|
#3
10-07-2017, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
|
|
#4
10-07-2017, 12:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
subsmission in two years. But to me that's fraudulent. If the card is OC then it just is -- and to say it is not is a lie. So are they now allowing 8OC cards to become a 6.? Geez I'm glad that I stopped monkeying with PSA. It's just a money grab now. Totally bogus. Would be more valid to just stop giving OC qualifiers completely and let the market determine if the card looks good for the grade.
__________________
Past transactions with ALR-Bishop, Fleerfan, Leerob538, Northviewcats, wondo, EconTeachert205 "Collectors were supposedly enjoying the pure hobby of baseball card collecting, but they were also concerned with the monetary value of their collections." House of Cards by John Bloom, 1997. Last edited by OlderTheBetter; 10-07-2017 at 01:03 PM.
|
|
#5
10-07-2017, 01:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, you're talking out of ignorance on this one. I have already wrote their standards down in the thread and you can get a 6 just for off-centeredness with no other damage and no OC if you request No Qualifiers on the submission. Either you didn't know the rules in the first place, or you haven't been paying attention for a long time.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My football rules complaint | billyb | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 11 | 11-11-2014 01:51 PM |
| Leon, a very minor complaint | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 08-21-2007 02:48 PM |
Hybrid Mode
