![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transference of ink from another Garver card placed on top of it?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My thoughts too.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's the most likely thing. It's not uncommon during production if the ink hasn't dried enough and a decent amount of pressure gets on the stack of sheets.
It can happen post production, and telling the difference can be difficult. This stamp (a card proof) was last printed in 1894. The one on the right is a different stamp of the same style bought at the same time and shipped together in the same holder. It didn't have the offset transfer when I bought it, the seller had very nice front and back scans. So the offset transfer seen here happened in transit between England and the US over a century after the stamps were printed! Whatever the formulation of the ink, it apparently never really dries. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened to this interesting T220 card? | G1911 | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 2 | 12-07-2015 10:30 PM |
Whatever happened to your card dealer of the past? | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 39 | 09-06-2015 08:49 PM |
It finally happened (regarding Christmas gifts for card collectors) | WillBBC | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 12-23-2011 11:32 AM |