My experience with LOTG

the-illini · #1 01-11-2018, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al C.risafulli

Yep, it's coming. Hang tight.

-Al

Hurry up Al; I demand an explanation for an issue that has nothing to do with me.

vintagetoppsguy · #2 01-11-2018, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the-illini

Hurry up Al; I demand an explanation for an issue that has nothing to do with me.

Don't be a jerk. As auction bidders, it affects us all. I think there is a lot more to the story here than is being told.

The cards sure arrived back to Al awful quickly if the recipient only mailed them on Tuesday. That's some quick shipping. It takes a check 13 days to get from Al to the OP, but only takes less than 2 days for the cards to get from the recipient back to Al.

I also think Al knew in advance that the Brown OM wouldn't be returned and that's why he told the OP to keep the check.

pokerplyr80 · #3 01-11-2018, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

Don't be a jerk. As auction bidders, it affects us all. I think there is a lot more to the story here than is being told.

The cards sure arrived back to Al awful quickly if the recipient only mailed them on Tuesday. That's some quick shipping. It takes a check 13 days to get from Al to the OP, but only takes less than 2 days for the cards to get from the recipient back to Al.

I also think Al knew in advance that the Brown OM wouldn't be returned and that's why he told the OP to keep the check.

That's a strong accusation. If true it wouldn't be a good look at all for LOTG, and a few posters in the thread would owe Jake an apology for criticizing him for questioning the gesture of allowing the OP to keep the lot and the check.

1952boyntoncollector · #4 01-12-2018, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

That's a strong accusation. If true it wouldn't be a good look at all for LOTG, and a few posters in the thread would owe Jake an apology for criticizing him for questioning the gesture of allowing the OP to keep the lot and the check.

Well IF the OP said he wasnt getting the entire lot back that would of been nice to know and more of a reason why he was offered additional money. Far be it for me to question things in the beginning.

Bpm0014 · #5 01-12-2018, 08:22 AM

Don't forget to keep the tutorial simple. Lots of pictures and few words.

Hahaha, will do. It's so simple. 99% of the crack-outs take less than 10 seconds. For real.

sb1 · #6 01-12-2018, 08:25 AM

The new PSA holders are not 10 second jobs, they are very difficult to open compared to the old ones, or SGC.

Please use a new holder in the demo.

slidekellyslide · #7 01-12-2018, 08:30 AM

Would someone in the conspiracy crowd please post their reasons why they think Al would keep a low grade lot of T206 cards that clearly DID NOT INCLUDE A BROWN OLD MILL.

Thanks

slidekellyslide · #8 01-11-2018, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

Don't be a jerk. As auction bidders, it affects us all. I think there is a lot more to the story here than is being told.

The cards sure arrived back to Al awful quickly if the recipient only mailed them on Tuesday. That's some quick shipping. It takes a check 13 days to get from Al to the OP, but only takes less than 2 days for the cards to get from the recipient back to Al.

I also think Al knew in advance that the Brown OM wouldn't be returned and that's why he told the OP to keep the check.

What do you think now?

vintagetoppsguy · #9 01-11-2018, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

What do you think now?

I think that all the truth hasn't been told, but that the OP is too much of a gentleman to keep dragging this out and wants to put it to rest. Want to know what I really think? I'll PM you and tell you.

slidekellyslide · #10 01-11-2018, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I think that all the truth hasn't been told, but that the OP is too much of a gentleman to keep dragging this out and wants to put it to rest. Want to know what I really think? I'll PM you and tell you.

Please do.

orly57 · #11 01-11-2018, 07:31 PM

Sadly, David is right. But no one cares, so what's the point.

ElCabron · #12 01-11-2018, 11:13 PM

All I�ve learned from this thread is that 1952boyntoncollector, Orly57, and vintagetoppsguy are total dicks.

orly57 · #13 01-11-2018, 11:45 PM

Ryan, maybe one day after one of your trips to Cuba where you fleece the poor and steal their cards for pennies, you can come by miami and tell me how you feel about me...in person. It's funny, I point out something shady in the hobby and I'm a dick. You literally steal from the poor. What does that make you?

1952boyntoncollector · #14 01-12-2018, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron

All I’ve learned from this thread is that 1952boyntoncollector, Orly57, and vintagetoppsguy are total dicks.

and the reason being? I can say comments like that from you make you look like a child though. We all live and die and not sure why you would take the time to make silly comments like that.

Who was i to question waaaay back that the simple return of funds wasn't so simple as it appeared..guess i was wrong..was a very simple transaction...return of proceeds for cards never delivered.(at the time) .thats all that happened i guess in this thread....there were no new developments or explanations needed after that....nothing more involved than that for me to question.......nothing to see here...

vintagetoppsguy · #15 01-12-2018, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

What do you think now?

The ball is in your court. What do you think now?

slipk1068 · #16 01-12-2018, 03:56 PM

zoinks

slidekellyslide · #17 01-12-2018, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

The ball is in your court. What do you think now?

I think the postmark is dated for the same day this thread was started at 8:30 PM. So I think without question the check was mailed before this thread was started. Unless you know of a post office open that late.

So now please tell me what does Al gain by not sending out a lot of common T206 cards. And I can only think that with you keeping this conspiracy going that you, Orlando and perhaps the OP who is sending you scans of the envelope must think he was getting a brown Old Mill card in that lot.

Edited to add: I didn’t include Jake Lieberman because I’m not even sure he knows what he thinks. What law school allowed that guy to graduate???

vintagetoppsguy · #18 01-12-2018, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

I think the postmark is dated for the same day this thread was started at 8:30 PM. So I think without question the check was mailed before this thread was started. Unless you know of a post office open that late.

So now please tell me what does Al gain by not sending out a lot of common T206 cards. And I can only think that with you keeping this conspiracy going that you, Orlando and perhaps the OP who is sending you scans of the envelope must think he was getting a brown Old Mill card in that lot.

But wait just a minite, Dan. In Al's initial response, he said he mailed out the check on Decemver 29th. When you start off with a lie, everything else gets discredited.

slidekellyslide · #19 01-12-2018, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

But wait just a minite, Dan. In Al's initial response, he said he mailed out the check on Decemver 29th. When you start off with a lie, everything else gets discredited.

The check was mailed from a USPS mailbox. Who knows when that mail got picked up. Either way the check was still mailed before this thread was started. Now please tell me what you think happened. What did Al have to gain?

botport · #20 01-12-2018, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

I think the postmark is dated for the same day this thread was started at 8:30 PM. So I think without question the check was mailed before this thread was started. Unless you know of a post office open that late.

So now please tell me what does Al gain by not sending out a lot of common T206 cards. And I can only think that with you keeping this conspiracy going that you, Orlando and perhaps the OP who is sending you scans of the envelope must think he was getting a brown Old Mill card in that lot.

Edited to add: I didn�t include Jake Lieberman because I�m not even sure he knows what he thinks. What law school allowed that guy to graduate???

Hold up. I posted the scan of the check in the thread. Because that is what I said I would do. If you have something to say about me, at least be right about it.

Frank Horvath

slidekellyslide · #21 01-12-2018, 05:09 PM

Frank, I apologize, I did not see that you had posted the envelope back upstream where you placed a holder.

1952boyntoncollector · #22 01-13-2018, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

I think the postmark is dated for the same day this thread was started at 8:30 PM. So I think without question the check was mailed before this thread was started. Unless you know of a post office open that late.

So now please tell me what does Al gain by not sending out a lot of common T206 cards. And I can only think that with you keeping this conspiracy going that you, Orlando and perhaps the OP who is sending you scans of the envelope must think he was getting a brown Old Mill card in that lot.

Edited to add: I didn’t include Jake Lieberman because I’m not even sure he knows what he thinks. What law school allowed that guy to graduate???

If you stamp your own mail at home or office you can manipulate the time pretty easily for backdating etc. Not saying that happened but just general knowledge in those situations when not done at the post office.

Thanks for not including me. Like i stated earlier, sorry for questioning the process early on.

orly57 · #23 01-11-2018, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the-illini

Hurry up Al; I demand an explanation for an issue that has nothing to do with me.

Al, apparently there's nothing to explain. Your loyal friends and followers will support you no matter what man. Don't waste your time explaining why this guy's cards were lost, and then found, and then one went missing. Don't get into the coincidence that the one that went missing just happened to be labeled Brown Old Mill. There is no need. Please don't mention how long you've known about this missing card or why you failed to mention it in your rather lengthy post about finding the cards. Guys are going to believe what they are going to believe no matter what.

the-illini · #24 01-11-2018, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orly57

Al, apparently there's nothing to explain. Your loyal friends and followers will support you no matter what man. Don't waste your time explaining why this guy's cards were lost, and then found, and then one went missing. Don't get into the coincidence that the one that went missing just happened to be labeled Brown Old Mill. There is no need. Please don't mention how long you've known about this missing card or why you failed to mention it in your rather lengthy post about finding the cards. Guys are going to believe what they are going to believe no matter what.

Ain't that the truth.

timn1 · #25 01-11-2018, 04:19 PM

All you diligent conspiracy hounds are right! Did anybody notice the number of Al's most recent post, where he "claims" the "explanation" is "coming"? - surely that is the key to all this - (plus he's from New Jersey...) Al is in fact the Antichrist.!

h2oya311 · #26 01-11-2018, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timn1

All you diligent conspiracy hounds are right! Did anybody notice the number of Al's most recent post, where he "claims" the "explanation" is "coming"? - surely that is the key to all this - Al is in fact the Antichrist.!

awesome! Hopefully Al posts something quickly so that hos post counter moves to 667!

Neal · #27 01-11-2018, 04:21 PM

if there has ever been a thread for "1420" to chime in, this would be it!

packs · #28 01-11-2018, 04:30 PM

This thread has everything. Will an auction house crash and burn? Will a guy get a Brown Old Mill? Will a poster with a maligned theory be vindicated?

Tune in next time.....

ruth-gehrig · #29 01-11-2018, 04:31 PM

I hate to admit it but I'm a bit glad I didn't unsubscribe from this thread 23 pages ago like I should have.

vintagetoppsguy · #30 01-11-2018, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruth-gehrig

I hate to admit it but I'm a bit glad I didn't unsubscribe from this thread 23 pages ago like I should have.

Hold tight. The best is yet to come.

Al C.risafulli · #31 01-11-2018, 04:45 PM

The plot thickens...

Developments over the last day or so require I make another post here, so here goes. Suffice to say I feel like the knucklehead in a bad 1970s sitcom. I know it�s a commonly-used phrase, but you can�t make this stuff up.

The lot in question, won by Frank, was a group of 11 T206 cards. This thread happened, and the person who received the cards in error told me he found ten of the 11. He kindly sent them back, because he�s a good guy, and did the right thing, and deserves a pat on the back. Frank was aware that only ten cards would be coming back. I did not know which ten, nor did I think to ask. Since Frank was only going to get ten of the 11 cards, and since in my mind I had already written off the cards as a loss, I offered Frank to keep his refund, as well as the cards. Frank showed exceptional character by refusing to take the money.

This morning I wake up and read about a Brown Old Mill. Guys, give me some credit. I feel pretty confident in saying that I�m not going to overlook a brown Old Mill and accidentally list it in a group of commons in my auction.

Back in early October, I received a submission of 76 T206s back from PSA, all from the same consignor. I grouped them together in lots, and passed them along to the part-time employee who was helping scan the cards for the auction. When I was proofing his work, I noticed that two cards were mislabeled by PSA as Brown Old Mill. One - the Paige - had already been scanned as part of what became lot 262 - the lot that started this thread. The second card - a Bill Bernhard that I was going to list on its own - had come back a PSA 4.5. Given that Brown Old Mills should not have numerical grades since they�re all hand-cut, something was clearly wrong - not to mention that neither back looked brown to me.

I contacted PSA about the two cards, and they asked me to send them back to be reholdered. I sent them back, PSA reholdered them and shipped them back to me immediately at their expense. Here�s a screen shot from the PSA submission of that reholdering/relabeling job, showing both cards and their cert numbers.

Meanwhile, the original lot of 11 cards - the one this thread is about, with the scan of the Paige card with the incorrect Brown Old Mill flip, was listed in the auction. The scan of the 11 cards SHOULD have been replaced with a new scan including the Paige in the correct holder. They weren�t. OR, the or the entire lot should have been listed as a group of 10 without the Paige. It wasn�t. That�s where I screwed up (the first time).

INSTEAD, the two cards that were reholdered by PSA wound up erroneously being re-scanned together, and listed as a separate lot in the auction - lot 234. That lot contains the Paige AND the Bernhard, in the correct holders. If you look at the Paige card in lot 262 and the one in lot 234, they are clearly the same card - same pinhole at the top, same cert number on the flip, but one has the wrong description on the label.

So now, I�ve got the same card listed in the auction twice, and I don�t realize it. It is a common card, graded 1, very unnoticeable. Except that Frank, and probably some other folks as well, think there�s a chance that there�s a Brown Old Mill hiding in a lot of relatively common T206s, and rolling the dice might wind up with a nice score.

And, of course, when Frank doesn�t get his lot, hilarity ensues, as it would only be natural for Frank to think that somebody was playing games on this end with his Brown Old Mill.

It wasn�t until this morning, when I read posts in this thread about the Brown Old Mill, that I realized that this problem went even deeper than I had realized. I contacted the guy who'd received the ten cards to make SURE he couldn't have possibly still had the 11th card, and he insisted there was no way. In searching to figure out if it was possible that I still had the Paige here, I searched �Paige� in my most recent auction - and there it was, in lot 234.

SO, I contacted the winner of lot 234, the two Old Mills, in hopes that I could buy that card back from him and send it along to Frank with the other ten.

The winner of that lot (lot 234) is a Net54 member, extremely well-respected in the hobby, one of the nicest guys you�ll ever meet, and anyone who�s been on this board for any length of time knows him. I�m going to leave his name out of this thread. He�s working on a collection of Old Mill Southern Leaguers and I believe he�s building the set raw. So he went to break the card out of the new, ironclad PSA holder, and he damaged the card.

It looks like this now.

So that�s why Frank is not getting the Paige. Because it has a giant hole in it, as I discovered today. The guy who got the 10 cards by accident was being honest - he only got 10 cards, and he shipped them back quickly because he is a nice guy who lives one state away.

This afternoon I shipped the ten cards, along with a check for $100 to cover the cost of the Paige, to Frank, via Priority Mail. He should have them Saturday.

A promise: As long as Love of the Game Auctions is a business, I will occasionally make a mistake, and when I do, I will own it and do everything I can to fix it. Less occasionally, but still occasionally, I will make more than one mistake with the same lot. However, a far more important promise (I think): you will never, ever, see me engaging in any kind of sinister, unethical behavior. I understand that the natural response is to assume - especially given some of the history in this hobby - that the worst possible thing is happening. However, I started LOTG IN RESPONSE to that element of the hobby. There are no shenanigans going on with this company. Period.

Had I found that I made a mistake and listed a brown Old Mill in a lot of commons in my auction, I would have withdrawn the lot, explained why, and listed the brown Old Mill as its own lot in my next auction. I would NOT lie about it, be devious about it in any way, because that is not how I do things. For those of you who would like to think otherwise, I get it, but it�s just not that exciting. If you�re looking to find an auction house lying and cheating its customers, look elsewhere.

Once again, to Frank, I apologize for all the ridiculousness surrounding this lot. I�m not going to answer questions like �Why did he ask to have his items before the holidays?� or �Why did the mail deliver one thing really fast and another thing really slow?� because they�re unanswerable questions.

I hope this clears everything up.

-Al

brianp-beme · #32 01-11-2018, 04:51 PM

Ok, guess my theory was only slightly correct. Let's all go back to the realization that Al is not the antichrist.

Brian

Stonepony · #33 01-11-2018, 05:07 PM

You cannot make that shit up!!!! I hope everyone has calmed down, I'm laughing my ass off.

Aquarian Sports Cards · #34 01-11-2018, 06:32 PM

As a guy who worked in live theatre for 20 years before getting into the auction business I can avow that Truth is indeed stranger than fiction. At various points in this narrative I have been close to jumping in with accusations and wild uninformed opinions. Basically this story is too convoluted NOT to believe (plus you can check out many of the details in the auction listing) I've never dealt with Al or Frank so I have no skin in the game, no favorite, or buddy I'm protecting, in fact it'd probably behoove me to shit all over Al and LOTG, but I actually believe at this point that the parties to the story (including the two ancillary parties) have all been honest and reasonable.

I said it earlier, we all hate to make mistakes and we really hate when mistakes are made at our expense, but how we deal with those is what shows our character.

I'll leave this thread with a little story. There's an auction house by me that conducts local auctions via internet. Not a card auction, estates, general, closeouts etc... My wife had been looking for a large desk for her office. They had one at an estate closeout that I won for a ridiculously low price. The auction listing read "Desk and contents." I went to pick up the desk and was taking it apart to get it in my van. A lady came in and asked me what I was doing. Apparently she had won an auction for just the contents of the desk. Yep the auction house had listed it twice. The lady in question stormed off to get an employee while I continued to take pieces of the desk to my van (leaving the disputed drawers) The employee came running out to my car and said she discovered their mistake and did I care very much about the contents. I told her "no" and she graciously offered me a 50% refund. I took it as I was "wronged" but it made me very appreciative of their efforts to correct what could've been an ugly situation.

Shit happens. Al screwed up, more than once. If I can read between the lines correctly, he feels like hell about it. Frank got screwed, he was pissed, he got mostly unscrewed and wants to be done with this. He should take the $100 and his cards and evaluate whether or not he thinks it was sufficient recompense for the hassles and if he'll do business with LOTG going forward, but he does seem to accept the story.

If anyone has a conspiracy theory which differs from the narrative offered I'd love to hear it, but it better be pretty damn compelling. As someone who works in the auction world and as a card dealer I am in the middle of granting someone a refund. It happens. I'll go on record as wagering that LOTG doesn't have anything like this go down again for a LOOOOOONNNNNNNGGGGGGG time.

EDIT: Post was written right after Al's explanation. Kudos to Frank for his gesture. I know animal shelters are a big topic on the site from time to time, love my rescued dog, just my 2�.

Jacklitsch · #35 01-11-2018, 06:50 PM

That's too funny.

deeg23 · #36 01-11-2018, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timn1

All you diligent conspiracy hounds are right! Did anybody notice the number of Al's most recent post, where he "claims" the "explanation" is "coming"? - surely that is the key to all this - (plus he's from New Jersey...) Al is in fact the Antichrist.!

😂😂😂 now that�s funny!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Consigning with LOTG	theshleps	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	4	05-29-2017 10:27 AM
LOTG Lot #149	petecld	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	1	04-01-2015 10:14 PM
LOTG Contest	MVSNYC	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	42	03-11-2015 12:11 PM
LOTG Auction	7nohitter	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	29	01-24-2015 03:00 PM
LOTG vs Goldin: Which will end first	bn2cardz	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	11-02-2014 07:40 AM