|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Leon - thanks for posting that from Lew.
I guess I should not be surprised but seeing such details and proof in print from so long ago, kinda confirms for me that a lot of doctoring is being done today. I've been seeing/handling t206's, etc since the late 1970s and I don't remember seeing so many sharp old cards as I do today. Could they have come out of olde timie collections? I guess. But if I was a betting man, and I am, I think doctoring is pretty darn wide-spread. Sad face. peter |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
For my book, I did a case study research on ancient American Indian artifacts. Many of the artifacts on the market have similarly been altered and for similarly various reasons-- from a century old farmer innocently cleaning up a chipped age of an arrowhead he found in his field to a modern dealer deceptively reshaping a broken artifacts into a whole or even better shape.
Luckily, in this area the authentic artifacts are centuries old with centuries old wear, patina and mineral deposits from the earth, so you can identify when and where an arrowhead or such has been altered in modern times. Unlike with baseball cards, a razor sharp edge or corner is not a desirable quality. Last edited by drcy; 01-17-2018 at 01:16 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
1. Any foreign substance removed from any card is an improvement and need not be mentioned to a buyer.
I don't consider this restoration, such as removing glue residue on the back, but it should at least be pointed out to the buyer. Most buyers IMO are OK with this. 2. Anything added to (like color) a card is fraudulent. Or building up corners. Horrors! Agreed. How the hell do they rebuild corners? That is FREAKY! 3. Nobody should trim cards. It's not the same card. Agreed. 4) If ironing out creases is successful, fine. Hell no! Sometimes these creases or wrinkles can reappear many months or years down the line (when the card is sitting inside a PSA 8 case!)
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Restored corners and major restoration like that is easy to identify. I wouldn't worry about that stuff sneaking forever undetectable into the hobby.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Perhaps we should discuss the impact of card nursing on the hobby as well.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
If restoration is no big deal then it should be no big deal to disclose it either.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Another thing is that there are standard advanced scientific tests that are used elsewhere, but not with trading cards. That doesn't mean that ten or twenty years down the road, someone won't do the tests on today's cards to identify which have been altered. I don't consider this whole discussion a big issue for collectors of mid to low grade cards-- which I assume is most people on this board. However, I think many collectors of highest grade graded cards are rubes. There's another area (not cards) that I bet will be a matter of rude awakening for collectors in the future, but that's a topic for another discussion. Last edited by drcy; 01-18-2018 at 01:19 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Over the years there have been many posts in the BST that tout the card as having "wide" borders. When I see posts like that, my first thought is - Maybe the seller of the card is possibly suggesting that this would be a great card to trim. Otherwise, I don't see any extra value in cards with wide borders.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
How would soaking fit into this discussion? Removing glue or tobacco stains from PBs for example. Just curious how this is looked upon.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Au contraire, I just made nurses better.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speaking of card doctoring... | seablaster | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-01-2012 08:10 PM |
| TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 11:09 AM |
| What Do You Consider Card Doctoring? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-15-2008 12:44 PM |
| Disturbing: "High-tech doctoring"/ "restoration" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-27-2007 01:26 AM |
| 1988 Card Doctoring article | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-29-2006 05:07 PM |