 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What would you pay for '33G Ruth, PSA 5, if it had zero resale value? | |||
| Nothing |
   
|
28 | 18.06% |
| Less than $100 |
  
|
45 | 29.03% |
| $100-$500 |
  
|
36 | 23.23% |
| $500-$1k |
  
|
21 | 13.55% |
| $1k-3k |
  
|
18 | 11.61% |
| It's still worth all 5k to me!! |
  
|
7 | 4.52% |
| Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
02-08-2018, 11:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I think the premise of this thread is flawed.
Granted that the market for my used socks is thin currently, but who knows what the future holds. To denigrate the value of the used socks ignores the market value of game used socks worn by the “Babe” himself. And what if Ruth’s socks from the game in which he hit #714 came up for auction with photo matching and certified fungal ancestry? Remember to register before you place a bid. 
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode