![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure if I put this one up or not after looking through over half the post to find it I gave up. Here is an interesting one of the red birds.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a true red bird card. Anyone know if that was a DP card. I have seen one seller pointing out a recuring cropping difference on that and other 61 cards in which there is a spacing difference between the names and team designations, or in this case the names and the title
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 02-17-2018 at 07:39 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just picked up this partial red pass on Pete Rose:
![]()
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not a graded collector but if a card was otherwise a 10 what deduction would it get for such a print defect, if any ?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Kind of a grader's discretion. If they consider it a "print defect", it would get a PSA 9 (PD) and count the same for the registry as a 7. If the submitter requested no qualifiers, it could drop even lower. Or it could stay a 10 if the grader doesn't think it's a print defect.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Funny you posted this Rose with the missing red pass, just the other day I came across this 77 A-ROD (the original) card with what appears to be the same missing pass.
Also found this 68 Cap Patterson with tons of extra blue.....his left arm just blends in with the sky. Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 02-17-2018 at 06:03 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a similar item to the card above only with Cubs. Over printing?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The extra "white cloud" above the trees on this 68 Curt Flood card has been noted as a print variation, but until today, I had not noticed that this print variation has variations. The cloud appears to come in various sizes. I wondered if this cloud was similar to the cloud appearing on the 461-492 68 Topps cards. However, the Belanger card to the left of the Flood card does not appear to have a cloud appearing on it's right edge to match the Flood card's cloud.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wonder if this defect shows up on any versions of his MB cards. It does not appear on the one in my MB set
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 02-21-2018 at 09:36 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I may have officially jumped the printing flaw/variation shark with these, but they are fun and challenging to look for. A recurring print flaw on the 1977 sheet with Robin Yount and Carlton Fisk affected about 48 cards, four vertical rows of 12. I still need examples of Larry Biittner, Charlie Williams, Robin Yount, Bruce Boisclair, Andres Mora, Gaylord Perry, Jim Bibby, Eric Rasmussen, Gary Thomasson, and Ron Hodges.
Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-26-2018 at 09:13 PM. Reason: Updated |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() 1977 Topps - [Base] #635 - Robin Yount Courtesy of COMC.com This is probably the Yount: item 5109687 because the photo is washed out. Hard to tell on this one because there's not a lot of red in the image. But it sort of looks like the 1962 Green Tints with less definition throughout the image. Do you need the Rose I posted?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
COLLECTING BROOKLYN DODGERS & SUPERBAS |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We all know about the stitching on the ball being different directions, but here are some other features about this card.
On the reverse, the ball is touching the left margin on one, but not the other. This is recurring. On the obverse, there is a yellow top to the fence or whatever is at the left, leading to his cap. The other version does not have this. This also is recurring. The yellow obverse is on the same card with the version that has the ball touching the margin on the back.I looked on both eBay and COMC and have concluded that this is the way these cards were done. I recall that this, along with Mantle and Robinson, were double printed and thus the differences. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |