 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-07-2018, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I've alway felt that the total was 535. You have 494 regular + 33 Yellow +
4 Team Checklist Numberical + contest card + felt elbum insert + Herrera error and card #13 Hoeft with white name and Red triangle.The card is not a print error (dot,missing color) but an example of how the card was printed during the run between the yellow and white name versions. 
|
|
#2
04-07-2018, 06:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Keith: You are right, I forgot completely about the Hoeft card. 535 is good with me. I was just editing my post when you found my omission. Thanks
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline).
|
|
#3
04-07-2018, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
So I have the Hoeft with white letters and yellow triangle.
Which version am I lacking for the set?
|
|
#4
04-07-2018, 07:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cards #13 Comes in 3 versions
(1) Hoeft name Yellow with Red triangle to the right of the Tigers emblem (2) Hoeft name White with a yellow triangle (3) The rarest Hoeft name White with a Red triangle There are photos of all 3 versions earlier in this thread
|
|
#5
04-07-2018, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
04-07-2018, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike -- what is your definition of a true variation ? Would it include the 58 Herrer, the 57 Bakep, the 52 Campos Black Star, the 67 Moeller white streak, the 61 Fairly green in the ball on the back ?
Do you know one when you see one or rely on someone else to tell you what are true variations  . No offense intended , who would have thought the 61 Fairly would be a recognized variation. Would the Herrer and Bakep make the cut post Internet ? Should there be a hobby accepted definition of a variation ? Collect what you like . I do. Hobby recognition does drive value, but is the 61 Fairly a print dot in your view ?
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 04-07-2018 at 08:54 PM.
|
|
#7
04-07-2018, 09:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No I don't know much about variations.
I am simply trying to complete my 3 sets. The 1959 and 1960 are definite on what is the complete set. I have found, however, that 1958 is not so defined. I have decided to go for the full "master set", and just need to know what that is. I appreciate all of the input. I am now more clear on what to focus on. Quote:
|
|
#8
04-08-2018, 08:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could someone please post scans of the 1958 Topps contest cards? I don’t believe I have ever seen them, thanks.
|
|
#9
04-08-2018, 08:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have seen July 8, but not June 30.
|
|
#10
04-08-2018, 08:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
 1958 Topps - Bazooka Contest #NoN - Baseball Contest [Poor*to*Fair] Courtesy of COMC.com The June 30 date is on the back.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| is there an official 1962 Topps Master Set ? | insidethewrapper | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-06-2017 08:51 AM |
| 1956 Topps Master Set List | jdeptula | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 08-01-2013 09:00 AM |
| Question about 1952 Topps Master Set | Cardboard Junkie | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 07-28-2011 08:16 PM |
| T-206 Master List vs. Inaccurate PSA Master Set | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 78 | 04-05-2010 06:48 PM |
| 1963 Topps Master Set | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 05-17-2008 03:13 AM |
Hybrid Mode
