 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-17-2018, 01:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
One thing i can tell everyone out there is psa is dishonest.. very.
As far as psa grading...track history of psa card graded card...if its a big time collector or a big shot as opposed to a regular collector chances are 90 percent that the psa card is over graded. Sgc doesn't pull that crap they are legitimate Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk 
|
|
#2
05-17-2018, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only time I submit to PSA is through a dealer who do bulk submissions. I've only done it twice when I was trying to flip some cards.
When I'm sending in cards that I want to keep in my collection its SGC all the way.
|
|
#3
05-17-2018, 11:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Everyone makes mistakes. The charges of favoritism to folks like 4 Sharp Corners or other large dealers on behalf of PSA is something different, however. I don't know if there is enough evidence to prove anything yet on a grand scale, but I have seen examples on other threads here, where an otherwise sharp card with a light wrinkle or barely perceptible crease or something like that gets a 6 when it goes through a large dealer and maybe a 3 or 4 when submitted by Joe Blow collector. That kind of thing is glaring.
My larger problem with PSA however is the inconsistency in grading standards over the years. Look at a grouping of vintage PSA 5's from the 1999-2003-ish era vs. those graded in the last two years and tell me if you think that on the whole the older slabs were held to the same standard?
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
