 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26
05-28-2018, 05:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
You still have the ability to declare "slab as authentic" even if it makes a number grade, but I don't think the submitters of these cards would have done that. These are not cards to be ashamed of and label as authentic instead of giving a number.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mistake | hcv123 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2018 09:49 PM |
| Bad mistake by PSA? | Baseball Fan | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 02-27-2016 11:12 PM |
| This is a mistake by BVG, right? | pbspelly | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-18-2014 11:15 AM |
| mistake | daviddbreadman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-09-2009 05:04 PM |
| A mistake, again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-26-2005 07:42 AM |
Threaded Mode