|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought they stickered cards with “high end” when eye appeal far exceeds the technical grade. What is this “premium quality”? Are they doing away with the term “high end”? Or are they different? Can a card get both stickers? What the hell is going on...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
HE lives!! PQ must be one step up from HE?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1912-T202-H...wAAOSwQz1bEbcR Good grief. One is "superior" one is "exceptional." Well damn.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-01-2018 at 10:46 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
"This is getting too silly."-- Monty Python
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Won’t be long, the majority of eBay listings will have “premium quality” in the title, and that term will get worn out and annoy the hell out of me like “high end” does.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Exceptionaly eye appeal for the issue, rating a 3/3 on our scale"
OK so spelling and grammar aside (really it makes your company look pretty dumb but whatever) how about a definition of "our scale" so we know what the hell "3/3" means. Oh wait, it's meaningless.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
So does a 4 on a scale of 3 get a high end?
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
What about when PSA teams up with PWCC to give extra points on the registry for HE and PQ cards? Won't that be special?
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble (Outdated) Blog: Click Here |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The same way an athlete can give 110%
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
My Monster Progess Complete Set......: 238 / 520 : 45% HOF Cards..........: 009 / 076 : 12% Southern League.: 000 / 048 : 00% Minor League......: 055 / 086 : 41% Portrait Cards......: 077 / 180 : 43% Horizontal Cards.: 000 / 006 : 00% Last edited by toledo_mudhen; 06-02-2018 at 08:17 AM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
From the descriptions of the two linked auctions high end is top 5% of examples, and the new premium quality is top 15% of examples of that card in the same grade.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by bostonmarathonman; 06-03-2018 at 02:15 AM. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's some additional simple math that further says this system is B.S.
If average as defined by pwcc's own website is 50% of the population, shouldn't below average and above average each be 25% of the remaining population (basic normal population curve)? You can further breakdown either or both of those population areas into as many pieces as you want, ie. above average, exceptional, high end, etc. but they should sum to 25% each. PWCC has somehow found it possible and proper to invalidate the immutable tennents of math/statistics by having below average contain only 20% of the population and the entire area deemed higher than average comprise 30% of the population. Last edited by iwantitiwinit; 06-03-2018 at 07:13 AM. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
HE is for the technical grade. PQ is for the eye-appeal. The hobby needs this.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As a consignor, I’m glad to see them do everything possible to maximize sales. As a buyer, I don’t care how they label anything (or how a grader grades anything). |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I posted this in a thread when I first joined Net54 (and seen it discussed in other threads as well) but I'll say it again. It absolutely blows my mind that multi-million dollar companies make these assessments without any, or maybe a minimum of, 21st century technology. We all know even a 1 pt change in a TPGs grading of a card can have huge ramifications in that cards value. Just looking on eBay today, a 1987 Donruss Greg Maddux RC SGC 98 is about a $80 card - SGC 100 is a $600-800 card. And that's a modern rookie - we saw the same thing at HA with the PSA 8.5 and 9 Mantle 52 Topps cards. I know everyone who saw the 9 raves about the card and from the scans, I agree, but that's something like a $1.6 million change over 1/2 point grade. Not even getting into the discussion of TPG changing standards over time.
My background is in engineering and I've seen quality related equipment that can measure down to the 1/100 th of a mm. It's impossible to believe that there is not scanning software available that could grade a card electronically (corners, centering, etc). You could also have permanent storage of the scan for any future needs. Maybe things like focus, clarity would still be subjective but the technology is out there to make something this important and $ related as objective and scientific as possible. I may be misinformed about how cards are currently graded by the TPGs and I hope I am, but no matter how experienced or trained a grader may or may not be, grading solely by visual inspection should have been abandoned in the last century. Rant over...Carry on
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes. This.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This could be the top 5% of the 5% of the 15% of examples of the card within the same grade.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 06-02-2018 at 08:29 AM. Reason: Percentages. I am confused. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is such b.s., how can you know something is the top 20% or 15%, etc. of a certain population unless you have the entire population in front of you at one time to evaluate.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
No point trying to bring reason or logic to bear on this. This is marketing hype pure and simple and bs is the currency of marketing.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Exactly....A complete marketing joke!
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pwcc Help | cardsnstuff | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-19-2017 08:15 PM |
| pwcc | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 280 | 02-17-2017 10:14 PM |
| Pwcc? | Manny Trillo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 09-23-2016 07:14 AM |
| Really, PWCC? | Bliggity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 09-06-2016 08:49 PM |
| Pwcc | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 04-12-2016 07:29 PM |