1951 Bowman Mantle or....

Bored5000 · #1 07-06-2018, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLongley

In regards to the Jordan, I own his fleer rookie, but have stayed away from the Star....reason being you will notice that only Beckett grades them and they do it purely for the money, because after the cards became popular the owner of Star still had the original printing plates and began printing them again in the early 90s and it's impossible to tell if you're buying an original or a reprint....

Hasn't that been discounted as BS? STAR Jordan cards were reprinted years later with the original plates, yet there are still only a few hundred total that have ever been graded? That doesn't compute. From a purely speculative financial consideration, the Jordan card may be the best option. If PSA ever does start grading them, the card would explode in value above what they command now, IMO.

Anyway, of the three cards listed, I would go with Ruth in a heartbeat over the other two because...it's Babe Ruth.

Neal · #2 07-06-2018, 07:59 AM

Ruth
I have never ever sold a Ruth (now have three) but have sold Mantles, including a 51.

Tough call on either, can't go wrong with those choices �. unless the choice is for a Star Jordan. PASS

BLongley · #3 07-06-2018, 09:07 AM

I have not heard it to be BS, and PSA did grade one.... one of the members here has it...it's the only one they ever graded and did so a few years ago...and decided against ever doing so again due to the reprint risk. It certainly seems that there is no proof that they weren't reprinted, if you buy it in the original bag it was distributed in I guess is the only way to know for sure it's original.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bored5000

Hasn't that been discounted as BS? STAR Jordan cards were reprinted years later with the original plates, yet there are still only a few hundred total that have ever been graded? That doesn't compute. From a purely speculative financial consideration, the Jordan card may be the best option. If PSA ever does start grading them, the card would explode in value above what they command now, IMO.

Anyway, of the three cards listed, I would go with Ruth in a heartbeat over the other two because...it's Babe Ruth.

Bored5000 · #4 07-06-2018, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLongley

I have not heard it to be BS, and PSA did grade one.... one of the members here has it...it's the only one they ever graded and did so a few years ago...and decided against ever doing so again due to the reprint risk. It certainly seems that there is no proof that they weren't reprinted, if you buy it in the original bag it was distributed in I guess is the only way to know for sure it's original.

I completely understand the concern about the Jordan 101 Star card, so I am not trying to be snarky. But I do wonder about why the graded population of them is not higher if there are so many undetectable reprints of them out there. Getting a Jordan 101 card (especially in higher grades) into a holder would be like printing money.

https://jordancards.com/blog/the-rea...rt-steve-taft/

BLongley · #5 07-06-2018, 10:14 AM

I completely agree with that thought... it seems only a few hundred graded, and it doesn't make sense...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bored5000

I completely understand the concern about the Jordan 101 Star card, so I am not trying to be snarky. But I do wonder about why the graded population of them is not higher if there are so many undetectable reprints of them out there. Getting a Jordan 101 card (especially in higher grades) into a holder would be like printing money.

https://jordancards.com/blog/the-rea...rt-steve-taft/

Peter_Spaeth · #6 07-06-2018, 01:03 PM

Multiple people have told me the reason PSA stopped grading is not that new ones were being run off printing plates, but that they had inadvertently graded some "Type II" cards -- preproduction samples never intended for distribution -- and were concerned they could not tell the difference.

packs · #7 07-06-2018, 01:17 PM

Call me simple but it seems to me that the explanation for there not being too many of them graded is that none of the companies will grade them.

Peter_Spaeth · #8 07-06-2018, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs

Call me simple but it seems to me that the explanation for there not being too many of them graded is that none of the companies will grade them.

Beckett grades them, so that does not explain it. There are tons of Beckett-graded Star cards.

Bored5000 · #9 07-06-2018, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs

Call me simple but it seems to me that the explanation for there not being too many of them graded is that none of the companies will grade them.

From looking at the last auction sale prices on eBay, the Jordan Star 101 is an $18,000 card in BGS 9, an $8,500 card in BGS 8.5 and a $5,500 card as a BGS 8 right now, yet even Beckett has graded many multiples of the '86 Fleer card. Even a mid-range Jordan 101 is a $2,000 card, yet less than 1,000 of them have been graded by the only company that grades them? PSA alone has graded 17,000 of the Jordan Fleer card.

If undetectable reprints were out there, those kind of prices would bring them out to be graded, IMO.

JustinD · #10 07-13-2018, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Multiple people have told me the reason PSA stopped grading is not that new ones were being run off printing plates, but that they had inadvertently graded some "Type II" cards -- preproduction samples never intended for distribution -- and were concerned they could not tell the difference.

The reprinting of the XRC was myth.

They were printing more from original plates but never the 101. It is completely and utterly false.

Don West was selling the reprints but they are the Lite set and the Crunch and Munch cards. I would also steer clear of any of the blue bordered "olympic team" rookies with the NBA logo in the basketball (not the 1984 blue bordered 5X7s, those are real and in my mind the true rookie as the issue date was the earliest). Those are all printed later around 97' Those Olympic cards were the basis of the NBA v Shop at home lawsuit that exposed it.

Peter_Spaeth · #11 07-06-2018, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bored5000

Hasn't that been discounted as BS? STAR Jordan cards were reprinted years later with the original plates, yet there are still only a few hundred total that have ever been graded? That doesn't compute. From a purely speculative financial consideration, the Jordan card may be the best option. If PSA ever does start grading them, the card would explode in value above what they command now, IMO.

Anyway, of the three cards listed, I would go with Ruth in a heartbeat over the other two because...it's Babe Ruth.

It seems I have heard a dozen rumors over the years that PSA was going to start grading these. I think they're probably started by people wanting to push the values up.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1951 Bowman Mantle PSA 6(MC)	invest	Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T	5	07-01-2018 05:40 PM
WTB 1952 Topps Mantle or 1951 Bowman Mantle	mhmeteorites	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-10-2018 01:28 PM
WTB 1951 Bowman Mantle PSA 2-4	cbrandtw	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	01-12-2018 04:33 PM
Buying 1951 Bowman Mantle + 1952 Topps Mantle	Sean1125	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	02-26-2016 01:23 PM
Wtb 1951 bowman mantle	peachlander	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-08-2014 12:16 PM