Venus and Serena

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by AGuinness

That is amazing. I don’t follow tennis, just a couple sports, but you seem to have at least a toe in most sports out there, Peter. Where do these two athletes rank in their generation, across the spectrum of sports?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Serena is arguably the greatest female athlete of all time, and her dominance in women's tennis is the equivalent of any male's dominance of his sport, in my opinion. Venus is very good and has remarkable longevity, but she is not in the same league as Serena. She might, though, still be top ten all time in women's tennis.

[Jim65]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Serena is arguably the greatest female athlete of all time, and her dominance in women's tennis is the equivalent of any male's dominance of his sport, in my opinion. Venus is very good and has remarkable longevity, but she is not in the same league as Serena. She might, though, still be top ten all time in women's tennis.

We've been lucky to see IMO, the best Womens and Mens players ever at the same time, Serena and Roger Federer.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Jim65

We've been lucky to see IMO, the best Womens and Mens players ever at the same time, Serena and Roger Federer.

And Nadal and Djokovic as well, IMO.

[AGuinness]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Serena is arguably the greatest female athlete of all time, and her dominance in women's tennis is the equivalent of any male's dominance of his sport, in my opinion. Venus is very good and has remarkable longevity, but she is not in the same league as Serena. She might, though, still be top ten all time in women's tennis.

Those are some seriously good genes (not to mention work ethic, etc. to put it all together).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CollectingAmericasPastime]

It would be more incredible if Serena (most likely, in my opinion) wouldn't have taken some sort of HGH.

Venus is the more incredible story in my opinion.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by KMayUSA6060

It would be more incredible if Serena (most likely, in my opinion) wouldn't have taken some sort of HGH.

Venus is the more incredible story in my opinion.

People have accused Venus too.

Little sister won easily tonight, no surprise.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Woman's sports for some reason allow for women of an advanced age to still dominate more than men in men's sports.....imo..

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

Woman's sports for some reason allow for women of an advanced age to still dominate more than men in men's sports.....imo..

Funny I think the opposite is true -- in swimming and gymnastics and figure skating, for example, teenage girls usually dominate.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Yeah I'm with Pete on this one. Name all the Dominant women's tennis players over 32. I;m pretty sure the list is Serena. I was thinking Navratilova, but she only won one major after 32.

[CollectingAmericasPastime]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

People have accused Venus too.

Little sister won easily tonight, no surprise.

They have, but I think it's a weaker accusation. Look at her physical progression vs. Serena's. Night and day. If anything, Venus took some sort of HGH/steroid to combat the medical condition(s) she's dealt with.

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Funny I think the opposite is true -- in swimming and gymnastics and figure skating, for example, teenage girls usually dominate.

Definitely agree. Behind Serena, there is an incredible amount of parity in women's tennis because the next crop of younger girls keep coming year after year. Sloane Stephens because the most recent up-and-comer that I can think of on the American side, with other, younger international players having an equal amount if not more success.

Women's golf has even had a lot of parody.