Please clarify the “Hugging” rule for me

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

Please clarify the “Hugging” rule for me

No hugging, no touching, no kissing, no feeling, no talking dirty or any other unwanted sexual advances. It's all considered sexual harassment nowadays.

[clydepepper]

I found it very offensive for an offensive player to interfere with a defensive player by defending against him. Stay in Your Lane!

[Rookiemonster]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

No hugging, no touching, no kissing, no feeling, no talking dirty or any other unwanted sexual advances. It's all considered sexual harassment nowadays.

Haha you’ve said to much I feel harassed now !

[Paul S]

Briefly, or, to be brief - or in another's briefs, as in jockeying for position - all of the above posts are covered under the "in the vicinity" rules.

[irv]

This is how the NHL is going to deal with Brad Marchand this year.

There isn't a no licking rule yet but until a rule can be put in place, any NHL'r wishing to lick their opponent, that gets caught, will have to wear one of these, depending on the severity of the lick, for a yet to be decided X number of games.