|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
A sample size of 1 is hardly conclusive of anything. This comparison only demonstrated that a higher grade on the flip does not always equate to more money. The SGC example, as has been pointed out, appeared to be a weaker example for the grade and consistent with the condition of the lower graded PSA example. I would guess, based on condition, the market was spot on in the valuation of the two cards.
I have been seeing recently graded SGC material doing better. Time will tell how that shakes out in the market but I hope it continues for them and for us. Competition is vital to life on Earth.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1 As has been pointed out many times the main place there will be price differences is in registry competition. A vg caramel card in either companies holder holds about the same weight to me. I think SGC is a bit better at vintage but I am biased too.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Be interested to know how Beckett stacks up against PSA and SGC relative to current values on pre-war cards. My own experience is that they are a distant third when competing against the other two in an auction format but can offer some great opportunities for nice cards properly graded.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
An$on Lyt!e |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Leon-There is really no registry on Old Judges and PSA kicks SGC's ass on price. |
![]() |
|
|