|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I gave in and tried spooning the wife....ugh...she still has wrinkles.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wet the surface of the card and use a spoon to press the crease out of the card.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks. Sounds crazy to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seller refused refund so I have opened it up with EBay. His defense in his response to my request was photos were provided and description characterized as PSA 6 so nothing else was needed as he didn't see the crease.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
You are talking with the seller way too much. And you should really take it up with PSA under their grade guarantee, or else this will continue to happen.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
PSA makes a mistake - Ok, it happens. Seller doesn't notice a crease- Ok, that happens too. Buyer has to do the legwork and deal with PSA to make it right - What? To me it seems like the seller should take it back and do the legwork with PSA. The buyer shouldn't be stuck with the nuisance created by PSA and the seller. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
If he wants to return it as "Not as described" and have the seller deal with PSA, that's perfectly fine. More likely is the seller will try to resell the card as a PSA 6 to someone else and we'll get this same post next month.
However, talking to a seller about this and sending him your motivations are completely unnecessary. More likely, you've giving the seller ammunition to provide to eBay to refuse your return request. Just file the Not as Described return and say "scan doesn't show heavy crease" and eBay will side with you.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
*duplicate post*
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 10-17-2018 at 04:55 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crease free? | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-19-2013 05:14 PM |
| Our friend the crease. | atx840 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 03-14-2013 11:27 AM |
| T206 CREASE(s) CONTEST | Craig M | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 02-07-2013 10:19 AM |
| A crease's effect on card value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-26-2004 07:43 AM |
| Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 08:10 PM |