|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			If people can't be bothered to read the words on the flip, that sounds like their problem, not BCCG.  And the link you posted only shows that I would be disappointed getting a card graded by BCCG, not that they're scammers.
		 
				__________________ -- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Agree technically that they are not scammers. But it is a very odd practice and overall business model. Unethical? No. Extremely frustrating? Yes.
		 
				__________________ Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			The BCCG model is absolutely a play to the low information/less experienced collector. It is a means of getting poor condition cards into the hands of collectors who will think they have a a high quality card when they do not. It is also a tool for predatory sellers masking junk as high quality.  It is not illegal and does not impact me but they are attempting to take advantage of those who are uninformed. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Adam (Exhibitman) noted the exact reason for BCCG.  Without going into gruesome detail, BCCG was a great and terrible decision for BGS at the same time. Rich 
				__________________ Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			really glad I asked the question as an extreme novice. Was hoping not to get beat like a red headed step child, should I venture out of my comfort zone. Thanks again guys.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			So is SGC being deceptive by going to the "standard" 10 point scale, except for having an SGC 10 be both Gem Mint *and* Pristine?  And creating a new grade of 9.5 Mint+ that no other grading company has?   Why muddy the waters even further? https://www.comc.com/Cards/MultiSpor...424/Graded/SGC  1992 Classic Four Sport Draft Pick Collection - [Base] #231 - Derek Jeter [SGC*100*PRISTINE] Courtesy of COMC.com  1992 Classic Four Sport Draft Pick Collection - [Base] #231 - Derek Jeter [SGC*98*GEM*10] Courtesy of COMC.com  1992 Classic Four Sport Draft Pick Collection - [Base] #231 - Derek Jeter [SGC*9.5*Mint+] Courtesy of COMC.com  1992 Classic Four Sport Draft Pick Collection - [Base] #231 - Derek Jeter [SGC*96*MINT*9] Courtesy of COMC.com 
				__________________ -- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Bccg vs raw | cardsnstuff | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 07-17-2017 06:39 PM | 
| Bccg | Manny Trillo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 11-03-2016 04:00 AM | 
| Bccg | bigfish | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 07-29-2010 01:39 PM | 
| Bccg | hunterdutchess | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 05-26-2010 06:51 PM | 
| BCCG........... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-05-2003 09:23 PM |